Quantifying the Potential Yield and Yield Gap of Chinese Wheat Production
Baohua Liu, Liang Wu, Xinping Chen, Qingfeng Meng
Abstract
Baohua Liu, Liang Wu, Xinping Chen, Qingfeng Meng
Abstract
Quantifying potential yield (PY) and yield gap (YG) is essential for prioritizing research and formulating food security policies. Here we used the highest recorded yield published in the literature based on 213 sites (n = 548) across China to estimate PY, the best farmers’ yield (the mean yield of 94th to 99th decile) according to 4552 farm surveys to estimate attainable yield (AY) in five wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) agro‐ecological regions in China. These data were compared with the average farmers’ yield (FY) to assess YG. The PY averaged 9.0 Mg ha−1 while AY was 8.0 Mg ha−1. The FY averaged 5.6 Mg ha−1. As a result, YG between PY and FY was 3.4 Mg ha−1 (FY/PY = 62%), and YG between AY and FY was 2.3 Mg ha−1 (FY/AY = 71%). Furthermore, PY and yield gaps varied considerably among different regions due to several factors, including water availability, climate, and management practices. Our findings highlight the potential for improving the wheat yield in China and regional advantages for wheat production. Core Ideas We evaluated potential yield and yield gap of wheat production for all of China. Yield gap was calculated based on field measurements and farmer surveys. Farmers achieved 62% of potential yield and 71% of attainable yield. Wheat yield gaps varied a great deal across China.
OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Quantifying potential yield (PY) and yield gap (YG) is essential for prioritizing research and formulating food security policies. Here we used the highest recorded yield published in the literature based on 213 sites (n = 548) across China to estimate PY, the best farmers’ yield (the mean yield of 94th to 99th decile) according to 4552 farm surveys to estimate attainable yield (AY) in five wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) agro‐ecological regions in China. These data were compared with the average farmers’ yield (FY) to assess YG. The PY averaged 9.0 Mg ha−1 while AY was 8.0 Mg ha−1. The FY averaged 5.6 Mg ha−1. As a result, YG between PY and FY was 3.4 Mg ha−1 (FY/PY = 62%), and YG between AY and FY was 2.3 Mg ha−1 (FY/AY = 71%). Furthermore, PY and yield gaps varied considerably among different regions due to several factors, including water availability, climate, and management practices. Our findings highlight the potential for improving the wheat yield in China and regional advantages for wheat production. Core Ideas We evaluated potential yield and yield gap of wheat production for all of China. Yield gap was calculated based on field measurements and farmer surveys. Farmers achieved 62% of potential yield and 71% of attainable yield. Wheat yield gaps varied a great deal across China.
Key concepts: Yield gap, Yield (engineering), Agronomy, China, Production (economics), Environmental science, Crop yield, Mathematics