2016Agronomy JournalRequires access

Quantifying the Potential Yield and Yield Gap of Chinese Wheat Production

Baohua Liu, Liang Wu, Xinping Chen, Qingfeng Meng

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

Quantifying potential yield (PY) and yield gap (YG) is essential for prioritizing research and formulating food security policies. Here we used the highest recorded yield published in the literature based on 213 sites (n = 548) across China to estimate PY, the best farmers’ yield (the mean yield of 94th to 99th decile) according to 4552 farm surveys to estimate attainable yield (AY) in five wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) agro‐ecological regions in China. These data were compared with the average farmers’ yield (FY) to assess YG. The PY averaged 9.0 Mg ha−1 while AY was 8.0 Mg ha−1. The FY averaged 5.6 Mg ha−1. As a result, YG between PY and FY was 3.4 Mg ha−1 (FY/PY = 62%), and YG between AY and FY was 2.3 Mg ha−1 (FY/AY = 71%). Furthermore, PY and yield gaps varied considerably among different regions due to several factors, including water availability, climate, and management practices. Our findings highlight the potential for improving the wheat yield in China and regional advantages for wheat production. Core Ideas We evaluated potential yield and yield gap of wheat production for all of China. Yield gap was calculated based on field measurements and farmer surveys. Farmers achieved 62% of potential yield and 71% of attainable yield. Wheat yield gaps varied a great deal across China.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Quantifying potential yield (PY) and yield gap (YG) is essential for prioritizing research and formulating food security policies. Here we used the highest recorded yield published in the literature based on 213 sites (n = 548) across China to estimate PY, the best farmers’ yield (the mean yield of 94th to 99th decile) according to 4552 farm surveys to estimate attainable yield (AY) in five wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) agro‐ecological regions in China. These data were compared with the average farmers’ yield (FY) to assess YG. The PY averaged 9.0 Mg ha−1 while AY was 8.0 Mg ha−1. The FY averaged 5.6 Mg ha−1. As a result, YG between PY and FY was 3.4 Mg ha−1 (FY/PY = 62%), and YG between AY and FY was 2.3 Mg ha−1 (FY/AY = 71%). Furthermore, PY and yield gaps varied considerably among different regions due to several factors, including water availability, climate, and management practices. Our findings highlight the potential for improving the wheat yield in China and regional advantages for wheat production. Core Ideas We evaluated potential yield and yield gap of wheat production for all of China. Yield gap was calculated based on field measurements and farmer surveys. Farmers achieved 62% of potential yield and 71% of attainable yield. Wheat yield gaps varied a great deal across China.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Quantifying potential yield (PY) and yield gap (YG) is essential for prioritizing research and formulating food security policies. Here we used the highest recorded yield published in the literature based on 213 sites (n = 548) across China to estimate PY, the best farmers’ yield (the mean yield of 94th to 99th decile) according to 4552 farm surveys to estimate attainable yield (AY) in five wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) agro‐ecological regions in China. These data were compared with the average farmers’ yield (FY) to assess YG. The PY averaged 9.0 Mg ha−1 while AY was 8.0 Mg ha−1. The FY averaged 5.6 Mg ha−1. As a result, YG between PY and FY was 3.4 Mg ha−1 (FY/PY = 62%), and YG between AY and FY was 2.3 Mg ha−1 (FY/AY = 71%). Furthermore, PY and yield gaps varied considerably among different regions due to several factors, including water availability, climate, and management practices. Our findings highlight the potential for improving the wheat yield in China and regional advantages for wheat production. Core Ideas We evaluated potential yield and yield gap of wheat production for all of China. Yield gap was calculated based on field measurements and farmer surveys. Farmers achieved 62% of potential yield and 71% of attainable yield. Wheat yield gaps varied a great deal across China.

Key concepts: Yield gap, Yield (engineering), Agronomy, China, Production (economics), Environmental science, Crop yield, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantifying the Potential Yield and Yield Gap of Chinese Wheat Production — Research Paper | ScholarLens