The Criminal Mind
Guyora Binder
Abstract
Guyora Binder
Abstract
This chapter amplifies the concept of a criminal offense by examining the concept of criminal culpability and the proposition that a guilty mind or mens rea is also a necessary element of every criminal offense. Although mens rea is a central concept of the criminal law, it is an ambiguous one. This chapter explains that ambiguity historically. It shows that over the course of two centuries a utilitarian reform movement developed and promoted the idea that every offense should have a statutorily defined mental element. Prior to that time, culpability figured primarily as an excuse. This chapter also discusses the related concept of strict liability, or liability without culpability.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter amplifies the concept of a criminal offense by examining the concept of criminal culpability and the proposition that a guilty mind or mens rea is also a necessary element of every criminal offense. Although mens rea is a central concept of the criminal law, it is an ambiguous one. This chapter explains that ambiguity historically. It shows that over the course of two centuries a utilitarian reform movement developed and promoted the idea that every offense should have a statutorily defined mental element. Prior to that time, culpability figured primarily as an excuse. This chapter also discusses the related concept of strict liability, or liability without culpability.
Key concepts: Culpability, Mens rea, Excuse, Criminal law, Element (criminal law), Ambiguity, Criminal liability, Proposition