2007Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen)Requires access

Separate Units or Parallel Networks: The Role of Innovation Types in Balanced Structures' Success

Alexander Zimmermann

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study aims at contributing to the emerging debate on how structural solutions are able to reconcile exploitation and exploration's conflicting organizational requirements. Based on a thorough evaluation of the existing literature, we identify separate units and parallel network structures as two distinct patterns of balanced organizational designs that seem to be able to simultaneously achieve both objectives. In several hypotheses, we argue that the type of innovation is a central contingency for the structural solutions' success. While separate units can be expected to be more successful under radical innovation conditions, parallel network structures presumably deliver superior results in a context of more incremental innovation. We suggest a detailed research design for our hypotheses' upcoming validation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study aims at contributing to the emerging debate on how structural solutions are able to reconcile exploitation and exploration's conflicting organizational requirements. Based on a thorough evaluation of the existing literature, we identify separate units and parallel network structures as two distinct patterns of balanced organizational designs that seem to be able to simultaneously achieve both objectives. In several hypotheses, we argue that the type of innovation is a central contingency for the structural solutions' success. While separate units can be expected to be more successful under radical innovation conditions, parallel network structures presumably deliver superior results in a context of more incremental innovation. We suggest a detailed research design for our hypotheses' upcoming validation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study aims at contributing to the emerging debate on how structural solutions are able to reconcile exploitation and exploration's conflicting organizational requirements. Based on a thorough evaluation of the existing literature, we identify separate units and parallel network structures as two distinct patterns of balanced organizational designs that seem to be able to simultaneously achieve both objectives. In several hypotheses, we argue that the type of innovation is a central contingency for the structural solutions' success. While separate units can be expected to be more successful under radical innovation conditions, parallel network structures presumably deliver superior results in a context of more incremental innovation. We suggest a detailed research design for our hypotheses' upcoming validation.

Key concepts: Contingency, Context (archaeology), Computer science, Knowledge management, Contingency theory, Organizational structure, Process management, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Separate Units or Parallel Networks: The Role of Innovation Types in Balanced Structures' Success — Research Paper | ScholarLens