2000Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model

Robert E. McCulloch, Peter E. Rossi

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

Introduction In this chapter, we discuss Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model (MNP) using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Although the MNP model has been in the econometrics and psychology literature for some 60 years, it is only recently that estimation and inference methods have made it feasible to analyze MNP models with more than two or three response categories. Classical sampling theoretic approaches to estimation of the MNP model have recently been proposed in the econometrics literature (see Hajivassiliou (1994) for an excellent overview of these methods). All of these classical econometric methods rely on asymptotic approximations to conduct inference about the probit model parameters. McCulloch and Rossi (1994) show that is possible to conduct exact, likelihood-based inference for the MNP model by using a Bayesian simulation method which complements the work by Albert and Chib (1993) on the binomial probit model (see Zellner and Rossi (1984) for a non-simulation approach to Bayesian inference in the binomial setting). Evidence in McCulloch and Rossi (1994) and Geweke, Keane, and Runkle (1994) shows that the asymptotic approximations used in the classical approaches can be inaccurate and that the improved inference available in the Bayesian approach is no more computationally demanding than the classical simulation-based approaches. Our Bayesian method can easily be extended to handle hierarchical or random coefficient models used with panel data, autocorrelated latent regression errors, and non-normal random coefficient distributions all within the same hierarchical framework.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction In this chapter, we discuss Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model (MNP) using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Although the MNP model has been in the econometrics and psychology literature for some 60 years, it is only recently that estimation and inference methods have made it feasible to analyze MNP models with more than two or three response categories. Classical sampling theoretic approaches to estimation of the MNP model have recently been proposed in the econometrics literature (see Hajivassiliou (1994) for an excellent overview of these methods). All of these classical econometric methods rely on asymptotic approximations to conduct inference about the probit model parameters. McCulloch and Rossi (1994) show that is possible to conduct exact, likelihood-based inference for the MNP model by using a Bayesian simulation method which complements the work by Albert and Chib (1993) on the binomial probit model (see Zellner and Rossi (1984) for a non-simulation approach to Bayesian inference in the binomial setting). Evidence in McCulloch and Rossi (1994) and Geweke, Keane, and Runkle (1994) shows that the asymptotic approximations used in the classical approaches can be inaccurate and that the improved inference available in the Bayesian approach is no more computationally demanding than the classical simulation-based approaches. Our Bayesian method can easily be extended to handle hierarchical or random coefficient models used with panel data, autocorrelated latent regression errors, and non-normal random coefficient distributions all within the same hierarchical framework.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction In this chapter, we discuss Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model (MNP) using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Although the MNP model has been in the econometrics and psychology literature for some 60 years, it is only recently that estimation and inference methods have made it feasible to analyze MNP models with more than two or three response categories. Classical sampling theoretic approaches to estimation of the MNP model have recently been proposed in the econometrics literature (see Hajivassiliou (1994) for an excellent overview of these methods). All of these classical econometric methods rely on asymptotic approximations to conduct inference about the probit model parameters. McCulloch and Rossi (1994) show that is possible to conduct exact, likelihood-based inference for the MNP model by using a Bayesian simulation method which complements the work by Albert and Chib (1993) on the binomial probit model (see Zellner and Rossi (1984) for a non-simulation approach to Bayesian inference in the binomial setting). Evidence in McCulloch and Rossi (1994) and Geweke, Keane, and Runkle (1994) shows that the asymptotic approximations used in the classical approaches can be inaccurate and that the improved inference available in the Bayesian approach is no more computationally demanding than the classical simulation-based approaches. Our Bayesian method can easily be extended to handle hierarchical or random coefficient models used with panel data, autocorrelated latent regression errors, and non-normal random coefficient distributions all within the same hierarchical framework.

Key concepts: Multinomial probit, Multinomial distribution, Econometrics, Bayesian probability, Probit model, Ordered probit, Probit, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model — Research Paper | ScholarLens