2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of Medieval Logic with Contemporary Logic

Terence Parsons

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract It appears that the logic developed so far is weak without anaphoric pronouns, but with those pronouns it is as rich as ordinary first-order symbolic logic. It is easy to represent propositions of medieval logic, one at a time, within predicate logic with identity. One problem with representing modern logic within medieval logic concerns existential import; for example, a natural statement to the effect that less-than is transitive entails that something is less than zero. This can be avoided by some technical rephrases involving infinitizing negation. Representing modern logic within medieval logic raises problems because of the latter’s grammatical structure; these problems may be overcome. An algorithm is given for representing sentences of modern logic within medieval logic. In the last section an illustration is given of how first-order arithmetic would look if formulated within medieval logic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract It appears that the logic developed so far is weak without anaphoric pronouns, but with those pronouns it is as rich as ordinary first-order symbolic logic. It is easy to represent propositions of medieval logic, one at a time, within predicate logic with identity. One problem with representing modern logic within medieval logic concerns existential import; for example, a natural statement to the effect that less-than is transitive entails that something is less than zero. This can be avoided by some technical rephrases involving infinitizing negation. Representing modern logic within medieval logic raises problems because of the latter’s grammatical structure; these problems may be overcome. An algorithm is given for representing sentences of modern logic within medieval logic. In the last section an illustration is given of how first-order arithmetic would look if formulated within medieval logic.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract It appears that the logic developed so far is weak without anaphoric pronouns, but with those pronouns it is as rich as ordinary first-order symbolic logic. It is easy to represent propositions of medieval logic, one at a time, within predicate logic with identity. One problem with representing modern logic within medieval logic concerns existential import; for example, a natural statement to the effect that less-than is transitive entails that something is less than zero. This can be avoided by some technical rephrases involving infinitizing negation. Representing modern logic within medieval logic raises problems because of the latter’s grammatical structure; these problems may be overcome. An algorithm is given for representing sentences of modern logic within medieval logic. In the last section an illustration is given of how first-order arithmetic would look if formulated within medieval logic.

Key concepts: Predicate logic, Philosophy of logic, Predicate functor logic, Many-valued logic, Predicate variable, Higher-order logic, Computational logic, Dynamic logic (digital electronics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Medieval Logic with Contemporary Logic — Research Paper | ScholarLens