2007CABI eBooksRequires access

Establishing conservation priorities for crop wild relatives.

B. V. Ford‐Lloyd, Shelagh Kell, Nigel Maxted

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

The problem with trying to prioritize a large number of crop wild relatives (CWR) species is the lack of universal data sets for the prioritizing factors that could be applied to all species. Without such data sets, effective prioritization of all CWR cannot take place; however, prioritization is required now. This CWR prioritization is discussed in this chapter. Specifically, the CWR Catalogue and the need for prioritization, criteria for immediate prioritization, prioritization using geographical unit occurrence as a proxy for threat, and prioritization with simple use criteria for socio-economic value are examined.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The problem with trying to prioritize a large number of crop wild relatives (CWR) species is the lack of universal data sets for the prioritizing factors that could be applied to all species. Without such data sets, effective prioritization of all CWR cannot take place; however, prioritization is required now. This CWR prioritization is discussed in this chapter. Specifically, the CWR Catalogue and the need for prioritization, criteria for immediate prioritization, prioritization using geographical unit occurrence as a proxy for threat, and prioritization with simple use criteria for socio-economic value are examined.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The problem with trying to prioritize a large number of crop wild relatives (CWR) species is the lack of universal data sets for the prioritizing factors that could be applied to all species. Without such data sets, effective prioritization of all CWR cannot take place; however, prioritization is required now. This CWR prioritization is discussed in this chapter. Specifically, the CWR Catalogue and the need for prioritization, criteria for immediate prioritization, prioritization using geographical unit occurrence as a proxy for threat, and prioritization with simple use criteria for socio-economic value are examined.

Key concepts: Prioritization, Proxy (statistics), Unit (ring theory), Geography, Environmental resource management, Crop, Environmental planning, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Establishing conservation priorities for crop wild relatives. — Research Paper | ScholarLens