2004•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Variation in Demonstrative Choice in Swedish

Jennifer K. Spenader

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter deals with variation in the choice between two demonstrative forms in Swedish and discusses the desirability of modeling pragmatic phenomena such as referential choice, in an Optimality Theory (OT) framework. In particular, the influence of several factors on the choice of referential form are investigated: abstractness and animacy of the referent; and antecedent accessibility, which is operationalized as distance to the antecedent or anchor of the referent in the discourse. The first factors have to do with inherent properties of the referent while the second factor has more to do with discourse structure-particular factors. All these factors are linked to the level of activation of referents, generally acknowledged to underlie choice of referential form. In order to investigate the factors and the relative strengths of their influence, a small elicitation experiment was conducted. The analysis of the produced data showed a significant effect for distance to the antecedent or anchor, with animacy and abstractness of the referent also playing important roles. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter deals with variation in the choice between two demonstrative forms in Swedish and discusses the desirability of modeling pragmatic phenomena such as referential choice, in an Optimality Theory (OT) framework. In particular, the influence of several factors on the choice of referential form are investigated: abstractness and animacy of the referent; and antecedent accessibility, which is operationalized as distance to the antecedent or anchor of the referent in the discourse. The first factors have to do with inherent properties of the referent while the second factor has more to do with discourse structure-particular factors. All these factors are linked to the level of activation of referents, generally acknowledged to underlie choice of referential form. In order to investigate the factors and the relative strengths of their influence, a small elicitation experiment was conducted. The analysis of the produced data showed a significant effect for distance to the antecedent or anchor, with animacy and abstractness of the referent also playing important roles. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter deals with variation in the choice between two demonstrative forms in Swedish and discusses the desirability of modeling pragmatic phenomena such as referential choice, in an Optimality Theory (OT) framework. In particular, the influence of several factors on the choice of referential form are investigated: abstractness and animacy of the referent; and antecedent accessibility, which is operationalized as distance to the antecedent or anchor of the referent in the discourse. The first factors have to do with inherent properties of the referent while the second factor has more to do with discourse structure-particular factors. All these factors are linked to the level of activation of referents, generally acknowledged to underlie choice of referential form. In order to investigate the factors and the relative strengths of their influence, a small elicitation experiment was conducted. The analysis of the produced data showed a significant effect for distance to the antecedent or anchor, with animacy and abstractness of the referent also playing important roles. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Referent, Antecedent (behavioral psychology), Animacy, Demonstrative, Variation (astronomy), Operationalization, Psychology, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Variation in Demonstrative Choice in Swedish — Research Paper | ScholarLens