Intelligent or Non-Intelligent Design?
John C. Avise
Abstract
John C. Avise
Abstract
This chapter recapitulates evidence for rampant imperfection in the molecular architecture and operation of human genomes. Inherent structural flaws as well as mutational glitches combine to produce genomes that are complex but often dysfunctional, and that invariably fall far short of designer perfection. These unassailable empirical findings extend the age‐old theodicy challenge into the previously unexplored molecular realm. From a scientific vantage, however, such genomic flaws are hardly surprising, because natural selection (a primary directive force of evolution) is nonsentient and far from all‐powerful. Contrary to claims from the Intelligent Design movement, the human genome is not irreducibly complex. Widespread imperfections in the human genome are fully consistent, however, with evolutionary expectations. The evolutionary sciences can thus be interpreted as emancipating religions from the ancient philosophical prison of theodicy.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter recapitulates evidence for rampant imperfection in the molecular architecture and operation of human genomes. Inherent structural flaws as well as mutational glitches combine to produce genomes that are complex but often dysfunctional, and that invariably fall far short of designer perfection. These unassailable empirical findings extend the age‐old theodicy challenge into the previously unexplored molecular realm. From a scientific vantage, however, such genomic flaws are hardly surprising, because natural selection (a primary directive force of evolution) is nonsentient and far from all‐powerful. Contrary to claims from the Intelligent Design movement, the human genome is not irreducibly complex. Widespread imperfections in the human genome are fully consistent, however, with evolutionary expectations. The evolutionary sciences can thus be interpreted as emancipating religions from the ancient philosophical prison of theodicy.
Key concepts: Realm, Theodicy, Natural selection, Directive, Genome, Natural (archaeology), Intelligent design, Perfection