Global Fifth Amendment
Harry Blutstein
Abstract
Harry Blutstein
Abstract
US legal scholar, Richard Epstein developed a radical legal doctrine of ‘regulatory takings,’ based on the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, which revolutionised intergovernmental and multilateral investment agreements around the world. First applied to NAFTA, it established a radical precedent that allows corporations legal standing to take governments to independent investment tribunals. As a result, private firms were able to force judgements on nation states guilt of regulatory takings, including substantial damages for lost profits. Unsuccessful attempts were made to include regulatory takings in two international treaties: the Trade Related Investment Measures and the Multilateral Agreement on Investment. They were defeated by opposition from development countries and activists. Undeterred, supporters of the principle of regulatory takings had more success including NAFTA-type clauses into bilateral and multilateral investment agreements. These have provided unprecedented protection of foreign investment.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
US legal scholar, Richard Epstein developed a radical legal doctrine of ‘regulatory takings,’ based on the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, which revolutionised intergovernmental and multilateral investment agreements around the world. First applied to NAFTA, it established a radical precedent that allows corporations legal standing to take governments to independent investment tribunals. As a result, private firms were able to force judgements on nation states guilt of regulatory takings, including substantial damages for lost profits. Unsuccessful attempts were made to include regulatory takings in two international treaties: the Trade Related Investment Measures and the Multilateral Agreement on Investment. They were defeated by opposition from development countries and activists. Undeterred, supporters of the principle of regulatory takings had more success including NAFTA-type clauses into bilateral and multilateral investment agreements. These have provided unprecedented protection of foreign investment.
Key concepts: Amendment, Political science, Law