2013Edinburgh University Press eBooksRequires access

Human Rights in History

John Lechte, Saul Newman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this chapter, Human rights in the formal modern sense are seen to have really come into being with the 1948 United Nations Declaration. However, there is also a strong eighteenth-century precedent in the form of the discourse of Natural Rights, and this is considered, as is Sophocles's Antigone. The key aspect of the chapter, however, is a return, in light of Arendt's philosophy, to the notion of slavery in Aristotle's philosophy and its Ancient Greek context. Hegel on slavery is also addressed; for the crucial point to note is that the dialectic of necessity and freedom plays a significant and determining role, not only in relation to the slave mired in necessity, but also with respect to the notion of freedom. Much of current political theory says that freedom is the essential part of the European citizen State, a State, it turns out, which those deemed still to be in a subsistence condition (necessity) cannot hope to enter.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this chapter, Human rights in the formal modern sense are seen to have really come into being with the 1948 United Nations Declaration. However, there is also a strong eighteenth-century precedent in the form of the discourse of Natural Rights, and this is considered, as is Sophocles's Antigone. The key aspect of the chapter, however, is a return, in light of Arendt's philosophy, to the notion of slavery in Aristotle's philosophy and its Ancient Greek context. Hegel on slavery is also addressed; for the crucial point to note is that the dialectic of necessity and freedom plays a significant and determining role, not only in relation to the slave mired in necessity, but also with respect to the notion of freedom. Much of current political theory says that freedom is the essential part of the European citizen State, a State, it turns out, which those deemed still to be in a subsistence condition (necessity) cannot hope to enter.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this chapter, Human rights in the formal modern sense are seen to have really come into being with the 1948 United Nations Declaration. However, there is also a strong eighteenth-century precedent in the form of the discourse of Natural Rights, and this is considered, as is Sophocles's Antigone. The key aspect of the chapter, however, is a return, in light of Arendt's philosophy, to the notion of slavery in Aristotle's philosophy and its Ancient Greek context. Hegel on slavery is also addressed; for the crucial point to note is that the dialectic of necessity and freedom plays a significant and determining role, not only in relation to the slave mired in necessity, but also with respect to the notion of freedom. Much of current political theory says that freedom is the essential part of the European citizen State, a State, it turns out, which those deemed still to be in a subsistence condition (necessity) cannot hope to enter.

Key concepts: Hegelianism, Declaration, Dialectic, Relation (database), State (computer science), Politics, Human rights, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Human Rights in History — Research Paper | ScholarLens