2007Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

“Thinking Federally” from a Governance Perspective

Susan E. Clarke

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The surge of interest in federalism as a political idea and institutional design option in a remarkable range of settings — from Italy to Iraq to the EU — makes the question “which federalism” particularly salient. Federalism’s appeal as a political solution in such diverse settings underscores both the plasticity of the federalism concept, alongside the formalism of federalist political structures, as well as its contested nature. The evolutionary pattern of US federalism highlights these features: even within the US context, views of federalism are very much “in the eye of the beholder” and continually at the core of contemporary political debates. As Martha Derthick (1996), one of the foremost federalism scholars, sees it “American federalism is complicated and unstable.” In both established federal systems as well as newly federalizing governments, therefore, it is reasonable to approach federalism as an ongoing project as much as a formal prescription for allocation of authority and responsibilities. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The surge of interest in federalism as a political idea and institutional design option in a remarkable range of settings — from Italy to Iraq to the EU — makes the question “which federalism” particularly salient. Federalism’s appeal as a political solution in such diverse settings underscores both the plasticity of the federalism concept, alongside the formalism of federalist political structures, as well as its contested nature. The evolutionary pattern of US federalism highlights these features: even within the US context, views of federalism are very much “in the eye of the beholder” and continually at the core of contemporary political debates. As Martha Derthick (1996), one of the foremost federalism scholars, sees it “American federalism is complicated and unstable.” In both established federal systems as well as newly federalizing governments, therefore, it is reasonable to approach federalism as an ongoing project as much as a formal prescription for allocation of authority and responsibilities. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The surge of interest in federalism as a political idea and institutional design option in a remarkable range of settings — from Italy to Iraq to the EU — makes the question “which federalism” particularly salient. Federalism’s appeal as a political solution in such diverse settings underscores both the plasticity of the federalism concept, alongside the formalism of federalist political structures, as well as its contested nature. The evolutionary pattern of US federalism highlights these features: even within the US context, views of federalism are very much “in the eye of the beholder” and continually at the core of contemporary political debates. As Martha Derthick (1996), one of the foremost federalism scholars, sees it “American federalism is complicated and unstable.” In both established federal systems as well as newly federalizing governments, therefore, it is reasonable to approach federalism as an ongoing project as much as a formal prescription for allocation of authority and responsibilities. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Federalism, Federalist, Political science, Politics, Cooperative federalism, Dual federalism, New Federalism, Salient

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“Thinking Federally” from a Governance Perspective — Research Paper | ScholarLens