2015•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Voice and employee engagement

David E. Guest

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Employee engagement has become a topic of considerable interest to academics and management practitioners. However, two versions have evolved relatively separately. Academics have assembled extensive evidence about the antecedents and consequences of attitudinal engagement, treating it as an individual level concept and demonstrating its potential utility. This version has little to say about voice except perhaps through its advocacy of job autonomy. Managers and consultants have adopted a broader, less clearly defined version, termed here ‘organizational engagement’, as a mechanism for increasing employee commitment, motivation, and performance. Although voice has been advocated as a mechanism for enhancing organizational engagement, the evidence suggests that in practice the scope for voice is very restricted. The analysis concludes that despite some rhetoric, employee engagement is unlikely to provide a mechanism for maintaining or enhancing employee voice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Employee engagement has become a topic of considerable interest to academics and management practitioners. However, two versions have evolved relatively separately. Academics have assembled extensive evidence about the antecedents and consequences of attitudinal engagement, treating it as an individual level concept and demonstrating its potential utility. This version has little to say about voice except perhaps through its advocacy of job autonomy. Managers and consultants have adopted a broader, less clearly defined version, termed here ‘organizational engagement’, as a mechanism for increasing employee commitment, motivation, and performance. Although voice has been advocated as a mechanism for enhancing organizational engagement, the evidence suggests that in practice the scope for voice is very restricted. The analysis concludes that despite some rhetoric, employee engagement is unlikely to provide a mechanism for maintaining or enhancing employee voice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Employee engagement has become a topic of considerable interest to academics and management practitioners. However, two versions have evolved relatively separately. Academics have assembled extensive evidence about the antecedents and consequences of attitudinal engagement, treating it as an individual level concept and demonstrating its potential utility. This version has little to say about voice except perhaps through its advocacy of job autonomy. Managers and consultants have adopted a broader, less clearly defined version, termed here ‘organizational engagement’, as a mechanism for increasing employee commitment, motivation, and performance. Although voice has been advocated as a mechanism for enhancing organizational engagement, the evidence suggests that in practice the scope for voice is very restricted. The analysis concludes that despite some rhetoric, employee engagement is unlikely to provide a mechanism for maintaining or enhancing employee voice.

Key concepts: Employee engagement, Employee voice, Autonomy, Mechanism (biology), Public relations, Scope (computer science), Rhetoric, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Voice and employee engagement — Research Paper | ScholarLens