Law and Economics from Different Perspectives
H. H. Liebhafsky
Abstract
H. H. Liebhafsky
Abstract
The question of the extent to which one's conception of law or of economics or of the relationship between them is a reflection of his explicit or implicit philosophical outlook is the topic with which I will deal in this article. The purpose is to provide a supplement to, or an extension of, what has already been published in this journal.I In general, I will deal with two different conceptions: (1) those based on First Principles, and (2) those based on historical, functional, and evolutionary conceptions.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The question of the extent to which one's conception of law or of economics or of the relationship between them is a reflection of his explicit or implicit philosophical outlook is the topic with which I will deal in this article. The purpose is to provide a supplement to, or an extension of, what has already been published in this journal.I In general, I will deal with two different conceptions: (1) those based on First Principles, and (2) those based on historical, functional, and evolutionary conceptions.
Key concepts: Economics, Neoclassical economics, Positive economics, Law and economics