Efficiency and Distribution
D. W. Pearce
Abstract
D. W. Pearce
Abstract
In defining benefits in terms of willingness to pay, and costs in terms of compensation, no allowance is made for the possibility that the marginal utility of income will differ from person to person. Although Marshall assumed constant marginal utility of income with respect to price changes, he was convinced that marginal utility of any good was less to a rich person than it was to a poor person. 1 Applying the Marshallian principle would therefore mean weighting each benefit and cost by the respective recipient’s marginal utility of income. The obvious problem is that of measuring the latter entity.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In defining benefits in terms of willingness to pay, and costs in terms of compensation, no allowance is made for the possibility that the marginal utility of income will differ from person to person. Although Marshall assumed constant marginal utility of income with respect to price changes, he was convinced that marginal utility of any good was less to a rich person than it was to a poor person. 1 Applying the Marshallian principle would therefore mean weighting each benefit and cost by the respective recipient’s marginal utility of income. The obvious problem is that of measuring the latter entity.
Key concepts: Marginal utility, Allowance (engineering), Economics, Weighting, Marginal cost, Compensation (psychology), Distribution (mathematics), Microeconomics