2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Fraud Investigation for the Auditor

Leonard W. Vona

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter focuses on guidance to auditors on how to respond to the risk of fraud. Understanding the difference between the auditing profession and the investigation profession is critical. While they sound similar, audits and investigations are different. Internal fraud investigations typically occur because of a reaction to an event. An allegation may have occurred through a hot line, accidental disclosure, and internal controls or through an audit finding. The first step is to determine whether the allegation is credible. If the allegation is not credible, the reasons for not performing the investigation should be documented. The second step is to investigate all credible allegations. The investigation process is intended to document the facts and circumstances of the allegation. The policy should indicate the need for prompt action to investigate and resolve allegations of fraud.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter focuses on guidance to auditors on how to respond to the risk of fraud. Understanding the difference between the auditing profession and the investigation profession is critical. While they sound similar, audits and investigations are different. Internal fraud investigations typically occur because of a reaction to an event. An allegation may have occurred through a hot line, accidental disclosure, and internal controls or through an audit finding. The first step is to determine whether the allegation is credible. If the allegation is not credible, the reasons for not performing the investigation should be documented. The second step is to investigate all credible allegations. The investigation process is intended to document the facts and circumstances of the allegation. The policy should indicate the need for prompt action to investigate and resolve allegations of fraud.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter focuses on guidance to auditors on how to respond to the risk of fraud. Understanding the difference between the auditing profession and the investigation profession is critical. While they sound similar, audits and investigations are different. Internal fraud investigations typically occur because of a reaction to an event. An allegation may have occurred through a hot line, accidental disclosure, and internal controls or through an audit finding. The first step is to determine whether the allegation is credible. If the allegation is not credible, the reasons for not performing the investigation should be documented. The second step is to investigate all credible allegations. The investigation process is intended to document the facts and circumstances of the allegation. The policy should indicate the need for prompt action to investigate and resolve allegations of fraud.

Key concepts: Allegation, Audit, Accidental, Business, Accounting, Psychology, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fraud Investigation for the Auditor — Research Paper | ScholarLens