2007Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Consumer Initiation and Imitation

Gordon R. Foxall

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In dealing with everyday consumer choice we have said little about what causes it to change, notably the introduction of new brands, new products, new practices. Why do established patterns of behavior exhibit dynamic breaks in continuity from time to time? Why do consumers stop buying within their current brand repertoire, if only temporarily, in order to try a new version of the same product? The topic is usually subsumed under the heading of consumer innovation or innovativeness in the marketing literature. But it is also relevant to the understandings of patterns of behavior and their interruption put forward by Rachlin and Ainslie. Crucially, however, it provides insight into the nature of the quest for evolutionary consistency in the ascription of intentional content on the basis of contingency-shaped molar behavior sequences. In this way, the analysis of consumers’ initiating and imitative behaviors becomes a vehicle for discussing the role of evolutionary logic within the framework of exposition for consumer theory worked out in the earlier chapters. The processes should be amenable to analysis in terms of an extensional behavioral science, intentional systems theory, intentional behaviorism and superpersonal cognitive psychology. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In dealing with everyday consumer choice we have said little about what causes it to change, notably the introduction of new brands, new products, new practices. Why do established patterns of behavior exhibit dynamic breaks in continuity from time to time? Why do consumers stop buying within their current brand repertoire, if only temporarily, in order to try a new version of the same product? The topic is usually subsumed under the heading of consumer innovation or innovativeness in the marketing literature. But it is also relevant to the understandings of patterns of behavior and their interruption put forward by Rachlin and Ainslie. Crucially, however, it provides insight into the nature of the quest for evolutionary consistency in the ascription of intentional content on the basis of contingency-shaped molar behavior sequences. In this way, the analysis of consumers’ initiating and imitative behaviors becomes a vehicle for discussing the role of evolutionary logic within the framework of exposition for consumer theory worked out in the earlier chapters. The processes should be amenable to analysis in terms of an extensional behavioral science, intentional systems theory, intentional behaviorism and superpersonal cognitive psychology. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In dealing with everyday consumer choice we have said little about what causes it to change, notably the introduction of new brands, new products, new practices. Why do established patterns of behavior exhibit dynamic breaks in continuity from time to time? Why do consumers stop buying within their current brand repertoire, if only temporarily, in order to try a new version of the same product? The topic is usually subsumed under the heading of consumer innovation or innovativeness in the marketing literature. But it is also relevant to the understandings of patterns of behavior and their interruption put forward by Rachlin and Ainslie. Crucially, however, it provides insight into the nature of the quest for evolutionary consistency in the ascription of intentional content on the basis of contingency-shaped molar behavior sequences. In this way, the analysis of consumers’ initiating and imitative behaviors becomes a vehicle for discussing the role of evolutionary logic within the framework of exposition for consumer theory worked out in the earlier chapters. The processes should be amenable to analysis in terms of an extensional behavioral science, intentional systems theory, intentional behaviorism and superpersonal cognitive psychology. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Imitation, Contingency, Consumer behaviour, Psychology, Epistemology, Ascription, Product (mathematics), Consistency (knowledge bases)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Consumer Initiation and Imitation — Research Paper | ScholarLens