1997•Unpublished venueRequires access

Theory and International Relations I: Past Debates

Chris Brown

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Wherever different territorially-based political orders coexist in the same social world some form of international relations is to be found — even though the term itself was not coined until the end of the eighteenth century (Bentham 1789/1960: 426). The academic study of International Relations, on the other hand, hardly existed before the First World War. In the second half of the nineteenth century when the social sciences as we know them today began to be differentiated, when ‘Economics’ emerged out of Political Economy as an allegedly scientific field of study, and when ‘Sociology’ and ‘Politics’ and ‘Social Theory’ came to be seen as addressing different agendas — a position that would have surprised Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith or Immanuel Kant — ‘International Relations’ remained unidentified as a discrete focus for study. Instead, what we nowadays think of as International Relations was seen as simply one facet of a number of other disciplines — History, International Law, Economics, Political Theory. It was not until the slaughter of 1914–1918 persuaded a number of influential thinkers and philanthropists that new ways of thinking about these problems were required that the discipline emerged.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Wherever different territorially-based political orders coexist in the same social world some form of international relations is to be found — even though the term itself was not coined until the end of the eighteenth century (Bentham 1789/1960: 426). The academic study of International Relations, on the other hand, hardly existed before the First World War. In the second half of the nineteenth century when the social sciences as we know them today began to be differentiated, when ‘Economics’ emerged out of Political Economy as an allegedly scientific field of study, and when ‘Sociology’ and ‘Politics’ and ‘Social Theory’ came to be seen as addressing different agendas — a position that would have surprised Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith or Immanuel Kant — ‘International Relations’ remained unidentified as a discrete focus for study. Instead, what we nowadays think of as International Relations was seen as simply one facet of a number of other disciplines — History, International Law, Economics, Political Theory. It was not until the slaughter of 1914–1918 persuaded a number of influential thinkers and philanthropists that new ways of thinking about these problems were required that the discipline emerged.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Wherever different territorially-based political orders coexist in the same social world some form of international relations is to be found — even though the term itself was not coined until the end of the eighteenth century (Bentham 1789/1960: 426). The academic study of International Relations, on the other hand, hardly existed before the First World War. In the second half of the nineteenth century when the social sciences as we know them today began to be differentiated, when ‘Economics’ emerged out of Political Economy as an allegedly scientific field of study, and when ‘Sociology’ and ‘Politics’ and ‘Social Theory’ came to be seen as addressing different agendas — a position that would have surprised Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith or Immanuel Kant — ‘International Relations’ remained unidentified as a discrete focus for study. Instead, what we nowadays think of as International Relations was seen as simply one facet of a number of other disciplines — History, International Law, Economics, Political Theory. It was not until the slaughter of 1914–1918 persuaded a number of influential thinkers and philanthropists that new ways of thinking about these problems were required that the discipline emerged.

Key concepts: International relations, Politics, International relations theory, Field (mathematics), Post-realism, International political economy, Social science, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Theory and International Relations I: Past Debates — Research Paper | ScholarLens