2007Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Mediation: Its Definition and History

David Spencer, Michael Brogan

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction Mediation is a form of dispute resolution, found outside the adjudicative space of the court-room or tribunal, where parties in dispute or conflict utilise the assistance of a third-party neutral to attempt to resolve their dispute. It is different from other forms of ‘alternative’ dispute resolution – such as negotiation, conciliation, arbitration, and early-neutral evaluation – in that the third-party neutral, the mediator, is present and assigned a number of qualities that are not as evident, or strictly adhered to, in the other forms of dispute resolution. Many commentators and adherents to traditional mediation practices maintain that a mediation is comprised of five distinct philosophies (confidentiality, voluntariness, empowerment, neutrality, and a unique solution), and that without these core components the mediation is impoverished, or not a true mediation. We explore these philosophies further in Chapter 3. Why is mediation so important? Why do we use mediators and why do we mediate? Simply, many disputes cannot be resolved by the parties involved. This may be because of impasses to communication as a result of power or cultural differences between the parties. Impasses may also be due to historical factors such as a previous animosity and distrust between the parties or the absence of a relationship between the parties prior to the dispute arising. A mediator is someone who is able to assist the parties who are ‘stuck’ in their dialogue with each other to get together, communicate in a relatively polite and semi-structured way, and exchange information.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction Mediation is a form of dispute resolution, found outside the adjudicative space of the court-room or tribunal, where parties in dispute or conflict utilise the assistance of a third-party neutral to attempt to resolve their dispute. It is different from other forms of ‘alternative’ dispute resolution – such as negotiation, conciliation, arbitration, and early-neutral evaluation – in that the third-party neutral, the mediator, is present and assigned a number of qualities that are not as evident, or strictly adhered to, in the other forms of dispute resolution. Many commentators and adherents to traditional mediation practices maintain that a mediation is comprised of five distinct philosophies (confidentiality, voluntariness, empowerment, neutrality, and a unique solution), and that without these core components the mediation is impoverished, or not a true mediation. We explore these philosophies further in Chapter 3. Why is mediation so important? Why do we use mediators and why do we mediate? Simply, many disputes cannot be resolved by the parties involved. This may be because of impasses to communication as a result of power or cultural differences between the parties. Impasses may also be due to historical factors such as a previous animosity and distrust between the parties or the absence of a relationship between the parties prior to the dispute arising. A mediator is someone who is able to assist the parties who are ‘stuck’ in their dialogue with each other to get together, communicate in a relatively polite and semi-structured way, and exchange information.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction Mediation is a form of dispute resolution, found outside the adjudicative space of the court-room or tribunal, where parties in dispute or conflict utilise the assistance of a third-party neutral to attempt to resolve their dispute. It is different from other forms of ‘alternative’ dispute resolution – such as negotiation, conciliation, arbitration, and early-neutral evaluation – in that the third-party neutral, the mediator, is present and assigned a number of qualities that are not as evident, or strictly adhered to, in the other forms of dispute resolution. Many commentators and adherents to traditional mediation practices maintain that a mediation is comprised of five distinct philosophies (confidentiality, voluntariness, empowerment, neutrality, and a unique solution), and that without these core components the mediation is impoverished, or not a true mediation. We explore these philosophies further in Chapter 3. Why is mediation so important? Why do we use mediators and why do we mediate? Simply, many disputes cannot be resolved by the parties involved. This may be because of impasses to communication as a result of power or cultural differences between the parties. Impasses may also be due to historical factors such as a previous animosity and distrust between the parties or the absence of a relationship between the parties prior to the dispute arising. A mediator is someone who is able to assist the parties who are ‘stuck’ in their dialogue with each other to get together, communicate in a relatively polite and semi-structured way, and exchange information.

Key concepts: Mediation, Psychology, History, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mediation: Its Definition and History — Research Paper | ScholarLens