2003•Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

Embodiment and Lightness in Narration

Daniel Punday

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Narratologists and cultural critics will agree that narration inherently creates and depends on authority, but discuss that authority in very different ways. According to classical narratology, narrators are constantly seeking to affirm their trustworthiness, their authority to tell the story at hand. One of the principle games that authors play with readers—indeed, perhaps the principle of “play” inherent in all narrative as understood by narratology and the crucial variable within the narrative text—is the tension between the information given to a reader and the degree to which readers should accept or distrust that information. On the basis of this narratological question hangs the whole structure of narrators, narratees, implied authors, and implied readers that account for much of practical narratological interpretation and debate. It is a formal question introduced at the very outset of modern narratology by Wayne Booth’s The Rhetoric of Fiction (1961) and one that continues to dominate discourse on narrative form. In this sense, individual narratives can be seen as rhetorically manipulating readerly trust for some individual textual end. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Narratologists and cultural critics will agree that narration inherently creates and depends on authority, but discuss that authority in very different ways. According to classical narratology, narrators are constantly seeking to affirm their trustworthiness, their authority to tell the story at hand. One of the principle games that authors play with readers—indeed, perhaps the principle of “play” inherent in all narrative as understood by narratology and the crucial variable within the narrative text—is the tension between the information given to a reader and the degree to which readers should accept or distrust that information. On the basis of this narratological question hangs the whole structure of narrators, narratees, implied authors, and implied readers that account for much of practical narratological interpretation and debate. It is a formal question introduced at the very outset of modern narratology by Wayne Booth’s The Rhetoric of Fiction (1961) and one that continues to dominate discourse on narrative form. In this sense, individual narratives can be seen as rhetorically manipulating readerly trust for some individual textual end. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Narratologists and cultural critics will agree that narration inherently creates and depends on authority, but discuss that authority in very different ways. According to classical narratology, narrators are constantly seeking to affirm their trustworthiness, their authority to tell the story at hand. One of the principle games that authors play with readers—indeed, perhaps the principle of “play” inherent in all narrative as understood by narratology and the crucial variable within the narrative text—is the tension between the information given to a reader and the degree to which readers should accept or distrust that information. On the basis of this narratological question hangs the whole structure of narrators, narratees, implied authors, and implied readers that account for much of practical narratological interpretation and debate. It is a formal question introduced at the very outset of modern narratology by Wayne Booth’s The Rhetoric of Fiction (1961) and one that continues to dominate discourse on narrative form. In this sense, individual narratives can be seen as rhetorically manipulating readerly trust for some individual textual end. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Narratology, Narrative, Interpretation (philosophy), Rhetoric, Narrativity, Distrust, Literature, Narrative criticism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Embodiment and Lightness in Narration — Research Paper | ScholarLens