1985Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Keynesian Unemployment as Non-Walrasian Equilibria

Dieter Sondermann

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

One of the fundamental insights that we owe to the work of Clower (1965) and Leijonhufvud (1968) is that the basic difference between the economics of the classics and the economics of Keynes lies in the assumptions made about the adjustment behaviour of the two systems: ‘in the short run, the “Classical” system adjusts to changes in money expenditures by means of price-level movements; the Keynesian adjusts primarily by way of real income movements’ (Leijonhufvud, 1968, p. 51). ‘In the Keynesian macrosystem the Marshallian ranking of price- and quantity adjustments speeds is reversed … The “revolutionary” element of the General Theory can perhaps not be stated in simpler terms’ (Leijonhufvud, 1968, p. 52). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the fundamental insights that we owe to the work of Clower (1965) and Leijonhufvud (1968) is that the basic difference between the economics of the classics and the economics of Keynes lies in the assumptions made about the adjustment behaviour of the two systems: ‘in the short run, the “Classical” system adjusts to changes in money expenditures by means of price-level movements; the Keynesian adjusts primarily by way of real income movements’ (Leijonhufvud, 1968, p. 51). ‘In the Keynesian macrosystem the Marshallian ranking of price- and quantity adjustments speeds is reversed … The “revolutionary” element of the General Theory can perhaps not be stated in simpler terms’ (Leijonhufvud, 1968, p. 52). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the fundamental insights that we owe to the work of Clower (1965) and Leijonhufvud (1968) is that the basic difference between the economics of the classics and the economics of Keynes lies in the assumptions made about the adjustment behaviour of the two systems: ‘in the short run, the “Classical” system adjusts to changes in money expenditures by means of price-level movements; the Keynesian adjusts primarily by way of real income movements’ (Leijonhufvud, 1968, p. 51). ‘In the Keynesian macrosystem the Marshallian ranking of price- and quantity adjustments speeds is reversed … The “revolutionary” element of the General Theory can perhaps not be stated in simpler terms’ (Leijonhufvud, 1968, p. 52). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Economics, Keynesian economics, Unemployment, Involuntary unemployment, New Keynesian economics, Ranking (information retrieval), Work (physics), Mathematical economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Keynesian Unemployment as Non-Walrasian Equilibria — Research Paper | ScholarLens