2016NAUKARequires access

Giving opinions or shaping process? The experience of the Research Ethics Committee at the Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University

Elżbieta Hornowska, Władysław Jacek Paluchowski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In most psychology studies the ethical issues of research process are discussed. It may therefore seem that the functioning of Research Ethics Committee is rather formal and its main role is to evaluate if these principles are followed. More than ten years of experience of the functioning of such Committee at the Institute of Psychology of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan shows that many of ethical questions need to be answered. Among others they include: problem of informed consent, range of information for participants, predicament of deception in research and research involving children. All have become a source of reflection and feedback information for applicants. As a result, statutory Research Ethics Commission task has been changed. The most important goal was pointing out the ethical implications of ongoing research activities rather than the simple evaluation of the research project.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In most psychology studies the ethical issues of research process are discussed. It may therefore seem that the functioning of Research Ethics Committee is rather formal and its main role is to evaluate if these principles are followed. More than ten years of experience of the functioning of such Committee at the Institute of Psychology of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan shows that many of ethical questions need to be answered. Among others they include: problem of informed consent, range of information for participants, predicament of deception in research and research involving children. All have become a source of reflection and feedback information for applicants. As a result, statutory Research Ethics Commission task has been changed. The most important goal was pointing out the ethical implications of ongoing research activities rather than the simple evaluation of the research project.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In most psychology studies the ethical issues of research process are discussed. It may therefore seem that the functioning of Research Ethics Committee is rather formal and its main role is to evaluate if these principles are followed. More than ten years of experience of the functioning of such Committee at the Institute of Psychology of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan shows that many of ethical questions need to be answered. Among others they include: problem of informed consent, range of information for participants, predicament of deception in research and research involving children. All have become a source of reflection and feedback information for applicants. As a result, statutory Research Ethics Commission task has been changed. The most important goal was pointing out the ethical implications of ongoing research activities rather than the simple evaluation of the research project.

Key concepts: Deception, Research ethics, Psychology, Engineering ethics, Statutory law, Process (computing), Task (project management), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Giving opinions or shaping process? The experience of the Research Ethics Committee at the Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University — Research Paper | ScholarLens