2015Unpublished venueRequires access

What we want from non-ideal theories of justice

Christiaan Broekman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This thesis covers the topic of non-ideal theories of justice. Different types of discussions have been associated with non-ideal theories of justice, but an overarching theme has been a frustration with the lack of influence political philosophy can have in the world. I will claim that, while the discussions surrounding the topic are diverse, if the aim of non-ideal theories of justice is to influence the world, two conditions have to be satisfied: feasibility and comparability. However, both of these concepts are not yet properly defined, and in both cases some shortcomings exist. In this thesis I will show the shortcomings in these concepts related to bringing political philosophy closer to action guidance, and will give a contribution where I can.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This thesis covers the topic of non-ideal theories of justice. Different types of discussions have been associated with non-ideal theories of justice, but an overarching theme has been a frustration with the lack of influence political philosophy can have in the world. I will claim that, while the discussions surrounding the topic are diverse, if the aim of non-ideal theories of justice is to influence the world, two conditions have to be satisfied: feasibility and comparability. However, both of these concepts are not yet properly defined, and in both cases some shortcomings exist. In this thesis I will show the shortcomings in these concepts related to bringing political philosophy closer to action guidance, and will give a contribution where I can.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This thesis covers the topic of non-ideal theories of justice. Different types of discussions have been associated with non-ideal theories of justice, but an overarching theme has been a frustration with the lack of influence political philosophy can have in the world. I will claim that, while the discussions surrounding the topic are diverse, if the aim of non-ideal theories of justice is to influence the world, two conditions have to be satisfied: feasibility and comparability. However, both of these concepts are not yet properly defined, and in both cases some shortcomings exist. In this thesis I will show the shortcomings in these concepts related to bringing political philosophy closer to action guidance, and will give a contribution where I can.

Key concepts: Ideal (ethics), Ideal theory, Economic Justice, Comparability, Epistemology, Action (physics), Sociology, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What we want from non-ideal theories of justice — Research Paper | ScholarLens