2011The MIT Press eBooksRequires access

Managing Policy Contradictions between the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols

Sebastian Oberthür, Claire Dupont, Y. Matsumoto

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This chapter focuses on management of the Montreal Protocol and Kyoto Protocol policy contradictions. It explores features of both regimes along with their influence on each other, specifically the Montreal Protocol’s compliance system—providing cues for the Kyoto Protocol’s climate protection regime. The Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism is one of the reasons for the contradictions between the two regimes besides the promotion of hydrochlorofluorocarbons and hydrofluorocarbons by the Montreal Protocol as ozone-depleting substance substitutes. The evolution and intensification of interplay management since the 1980s are explored, and the climate regime mitigation options are assessed. The chapter concludes with the effectiveness and future prospects of interplay management, along with the pros and cons of governance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter focuses on management of the Montreal Protocol and Kyoto Protocol policy contradictions. It explores features of both regimes along with their influence on each other, specifically the Montreal Protocol’s compliance system—providing cues for the Kyoto Protocol’s climate protection regime. The Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism is one of the reasons for the contradictions between the two regimes besides the promotion of hydrochlorofluorocarbons and hydrofluorocarbons by the Montreal Protocol as ozone-depleting substance substitutes. The evolution and intensification of interplay management since the 1980s are explored, and the climate regime mitigation options are assessed. The chapter concludes with the effectiveness and future prospects of interplay management, along with the pros and cons of governance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter focuses on management of the Montreal Protocol and Kyoto Protocol policy contradictions. It explores features of both regimes along with their influence on each other, specifically the Montreal Protocol’s compliance system—providing cues for the Kyoto Protocol’s climate protection regime. The Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism is one of the reasons for the contradictions between the two regimes besides the promotion of hydrochlorofluorocarbons and hydrofluorocarbons by the Montreal Protocol as ozone-depleting substance substitutes. The evolution and intensification of interplay management since the 1980s are explored, and the climate regime mitigation options are assessed. The chapter concludes with the effectiveness and future prospects of interplay management, along with the pros and cons of governance.

Key concepts: Montreal Protocol, Kyoto Protocol, Political science, Protocol (science), Promotion (chess), Corporate governance, Environmental resource management, Ozone layer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Managing Policy Contradictions between the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols — Research Paper | ScholarLens