Managing Policy Contradictions between the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols
Sebastian Oberthür, Claire Dupont, Y. Matsumoto
Abstract
Sebastian Oberthür, Claire Dupont, Y. Matsumoto
Abstract
This chapter focuses on management of the Montreal Protocol and Kyoto Protocol policy contradictions. It explores features of both regimes along with their influence on each other, specifically the Montreal Protocol’s compliance system—providing cues for the Kyoto Protocol’s climate protection regime. The Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism is one of the reasons for the contradictions between the two regimes besides the promotion of hydrochlorofluorocarbons and hydrofluorocarbons by the Montreal Protocol as ozone-depleting substance substitutes. The evolution and intensification of interplay management since the 1980s are explored, and the climate regime mitigation options are assessed. The chapter concludes with the effectiveness and future prospects of interplay management, along with the pros and cons of governance.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter focuses on management of the Montreal Protocol and Kyoto Protocol policy contradictions. It explores features of both regimes along with their influence on each other, specifically the Montreal Protocol’s compliance system—providing cues for the Kyoto Protocol’s climate protection regime. The Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism is one of the reasons for the contradictions between the two regimes besides the promotion of hydrochlorofluorocarbons and hydrofluorocarbons by the Montreal Protocol as ozone-depleting substance substitutes. The evolution and intensification of interplay management since the 1980s are explored, and the climate regime mitigation options are assessed. The chapter concludes with the effectiveness and future prospects of interplay management, along with the pros and cons of governance.
Key concepts: Montreal Protocol, Kyoto Protocol, Political science, Protocol (science), Promotion (chess), Corporate governance, Environmental resource management, Ozone layer