1995Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Legal Control of Administrative Discretion?

Ian Loveland

Open publisher page 70 citations

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates that questions of housing availability underlay the decision-making processes of all three authorities. Since 1985, the councils had all moved away from a situation of excess supply, and while Western maintained a precarious balance in 1990, both Eastern and Midland were implementing Part III in the context of an intensifying supply deficit. While Chapters 4–10 suggest that accommodation supply may be the primary systemic determinant of administrative behaviour, there is no entirely straightforward and unambiguous relationship between housing availability and the conduct and outcome of administrative process; the three authorities responded to particular Part III applications in different ways according to other variables acting within or upon the administrative arena.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter demonstrates that questions of housing availability underlay the decision-making processes of all three authorities. Since 1985, the councils had all moved away from a situation of excess supply, and while Western maintained a precarious balance in 1990, both Eastern and Midland were implementing Part III in the context of an intensifying supply deficit. While Chapters 4–10 suggest that accommodation supply may be the primary systemic determinant of administrative behaviour, there is no entirely straightforward and unambiguous relationship between housing availability and the conduct and outcome of administrative process; the three authorities responded to particular Part III applications in different ways according to other variables acting within or upon the administrative arena.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 70 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter demonstrates that questions of housing availability underlay the decision-making processes of all three authorities. Since 1985, the councils had all moved away from a situation of excess supply, and while Western maintained a precarious balance in 1990, both Eastern and Midland were implementing Part III in the context of an intensifying supply deficit. While Chapters 4–10 suggest that accommodation supply may be the primary systemic determinant of administrative behaviour, there is no entirely straightforward and unambiguous relationship between housing availability and the conduct and outcome of administrative process; the three authorities responded to particular Part III applications in different ways according to other variables acting within or upon the administrative arena.

Key concepts: Accommodation, Administrative discretion, Discretion, Context (archaeology), Balance (ability), Control (management), Public administration, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Legal Control of Administrative Discretion? — Research Paper | ScholarLens