2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

ConclusionEngaging the Political

Ticktin Miriam

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In making clear how contemporary regimes of care are complicit in furthering the structural inequalities forged by capitalism, this chapter hopes to breathe new life and legitimacy into struggles in politics that look beyond the immediate present and that dare to confront the limits of this order. By focusing on the time of emergency, regimes of care render invisible other forms of suffering and violence that extend beyond the immediate present. As such, poverty and other forms of inequality and oppression that are long-term, chronic conditions are not always understood as morally legitimate suffering, worthy of care—and therefore not worthy of political action or redress. Political engagement, compellingly articulated by Jacques Rancière as the participation of those least likely to be political actors, necessarily changes the meaning of political action for everyone.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In making clear how contemporary regimes of care are complicit in furthering the structural inequalities forged by capitalism, this chapter hopes to breathe new life and legitimacy into struggles in politics that look beyond the immediate present and that dare to confront the limits of this order. By focusing on the time of emergency, regimes of care render invisible other forms of suffering and violence that extend beyond the immediate present. As such, poverty and other forms of inequality and oppression that are long-term, chronic conditions are not always understood as morally legitimate suffering, worthy of care—and therefore not worthy of political action or redress. Political engagement, compellingly articulated by Jacques Rancière as the participation of those least likely to be political actors, necessarily changes the meaning of political action for everyone.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In making clear how contemporary regimes of care are complicit in furthering the structural inequalities forged by capitalism, this chapter hopes to breathe new life and legitimacy into struggles in politics that look beyond the immediate present and that dare to confront the limits of this order. By focusing on the time of emergency, regimes of care render invisible other forms of suffering and violence that extend beyond the immediate present. As such, poverty and other forms of inequality and oppression that are long-term, chronic conditions are not always understood as morally legitimate suffering, worthy of care—and therefore not worthy of political action or redress. Political engagement, compellingly articulated by Jacques Rancière as the participation of those least likely to be political actors, necessarily changes the meaning of political action for everyone.

Key concepts: Politics, Political science, History, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ConclusionEngaging the Political — Research Paper | ScholarLens