2002Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Limitations on Criminalization and the General Part of Criminal Law

Douglas Husak

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

This chapter shows how the general part of criminal law might be construed to include doctrines that place significant limitations on criminalisation — on the kinds of conduct that may be subject to punishment in the special part of criminal law. It explains why it is not necessary to embrace a conception of the general part that is neutral about the question of what conduct may be proscribed. It discusses the motivation for including doctrines about criminalisation in the general part of criminal law and describes limitations that might be derived from reflections about the nature of crime. The chapter also argues that the basis of hostility to strict liability might give rise to constraints on the content of offences and derives possible restrictions on criminalisation from the need to justify punishment. It suggests how the need to interpret and apply various defences from liability can preclude enactment of some criminal offences.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter shows how the general part of criminal law might be construed to include doctrines that place significant limitations on criminalisation — on the kinds of conduct that may be subject to punishment in the special part of criminal law. It explains why it is not necessary to embrace a conception of the general part that is neutral about the question of what conduct may be proscribed. It discusses the motivation for including doctrines about criminalisation in the general part of criminal law and describes limitations that might be derived from reflections about the nature of crime. The chapter also argues that the basis of hostility to strict liability might give rise to constraints on the content of offences and derives possible restrictions on criminalisation from the need to justify punishment. It suggests how the need to interpret and apply various defences from liability can preclude enactment of some criminal offences.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter shows how the general part of criminal law might be construed to include doctrines that place significant limitations on criminalisation — on the kinds of conduct that may be subject to punishment in the special part of criminal law. It explains why it is not necessary to embrace a conception of the general part that is neutral about the question of what conduct may be proscribed. It discusses the motivation for including doctrines about criminalisation in the general part of criminal law and describes limitations that might be derived from reflections about the nature of crime. The chapter also argues that the basis of hostility to strict liability might give rise to constraints on the content of offences and derives possible restrictions on criminalisation from the need to justify punishment. It suggests how the need to interpret and apply various defences from liability can preclude enactment of some criminal offences.

Key concepts: Criminalization, Criminal law, Punishment (psychology), Subject (documents), Mens rea, Law, Criminal liability, Strict liability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Limitations on Criminalization and the General Part of Criminal Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens