Limitations on Criminalization and the General Part of Criminal Law
Douglas Husak
Abstract
Douglas Husak
Abstract
This chapter shows how the general part of criminal law might be construed to include doctrines that place significant limitations on criminalisation — on the kinds of conduct that may be subject to punishment in the special part of criminal law. It explains why it is not necessary to embrace a conception of the general part that is neutral about the question of what conduct may be proscribed. It discusses the motivation for including doctrines about criminalisation in the general part of criminal law and describes limitations that might be derived from reflections about the nature of crime. The chapter also argues that the basis of hostility to strict liability might give rise to constraints on the content of offences and derives possible restrictions on criminalisation from the need to justify punishment. It suggests how the need to interpret and apply various defences from liability can preclude enactment of some criminal offences.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter shows how the general part of criminal law might be construed to include doctrines that place significant limitations on criminalisation — on the kinds of conduct that may be subject to punishment in the special part of criminal law. It explains why it is not necessary to embrace a conception of the general part that is neutral about the question of what conduct may be proscribed. It discusses the motivation for including doctrines about criminalisation in the general part of criminal law and describes limitations that might be derived from reflections about the nature of crime. The chapter also argues that the basis of hostility to strict liability might give rise to constraints on the content of offences and derives possible restrictions on criminalisation from the need to justify punishment. It suggests how the need to interpret and apply various defences from liability can preclude enactment of some criminal offences.
Key concepts: Criminalization, Criminal law, Punishment (psychology), Subject (documents), Mens rea, Law, Criminal liability, Strict liability