Shock initiation of the TATB-based explosive PBX-9502 heated to ∼ 76°C
R. L. Gustavsen, Ronald Gehr, Scott Bucholtz, Adam Pacheco, Brian Bartram
Abstract
Open-access reader
R. L. Gustavsen, Ronald Gehr, Scott Bucholtz, Adam Pacheco, Brian Bartram
Abstract
Open-access reader
We present gas-gun driven plate impact shock initiation experiments on the explosive PBX 9502 (95 weight percent triaminotrinitrobenzene, 5 weight percent Kel-F 800 binder) heated to ∼ 76°C. PBX 9502 samples were heated by flowing hot air through a sample mounting plate and surrounding coil. Temperatures were monitored using embedded and surface mounted type-E thermocouples. The shock to detonation transition was recorded using embedded electromagnetic particle velocity gauges. Results show increased shock sensitivity; time and distance to detonation onset vs. initial shock pressure are shorter than when the sample is initially at ambient temperature. Our results are consistent with those reported by Dallman and Wackerle: the “Pop-plot,” or distance to detonation, xD, vs. impact pressure, P, is log10(xD) = 3.41 − 2.47 log10(P).
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We present gas-gun driven plate impact shock initiation experiments on the explosive PBX 9502 (95 weight percent triaminotrinitrobenzene, 5 weight percent Kel-F 800 binder) heated to ∼ 76°C. PBX 9502 samples were heated by flowing hot air through a sample mounting plate and surrounding coil. Temperatures were monitored using embedded and surface mounted type-E thermocouples. The shock to detonation transition was recorded using embedded electromagnetic particle velocity gauges. Results show increased shock sensitivity; time and distance to detonation onset vs. initial shock pressure are shorter than when the sample is initially at ambient temperature. Our results are consistent with those reported by Dallman and Wackerle: the “Pop-plot,” or distance to detonation, xD, vs. impact pressure, P, is log10(xD) = 3.41 − 2.47 log10(P).
Key concepts: TATB, Explosive material, Shock (circulatory), Materials science, Nuclear engineering, Computer science, Medicine, Chemistry