2011The MIT Press eBooksRequires access

Creative Authorship without Ultimate Responsibility

Bruce N. Waller

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses the repercussions of giving up the belief in moral responsibility and how this can negatively affect human life. Giving up the belief in moral responsibility entails also giving up the belief that blame and punishment can be justly deserved. The arguments in this chapter all make the case that this is a great benefit. However, a strong sense that loss of ultimate responsibility is a grave loss remains even after considering the advantages of the rejection of justly deserved blame and punishment. Robert Kane and Saul Smilansky, two of the most profound proponents of moral responsibility, respond to this “loss” by ignoring it and considering what other loss comes about in denying ultimate responsibility that supports just deserts. Both philosophers concur that the loss to which they refer is a significant one.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses the repercussions of giving up the belief in moral responsibility and how this can negatively affect human life. Giving up the belief in moral responsibility entails also giving up the belief that blame and punishment can be justly deserved. The arguments in this chapter all make the case that this is a great benefit. However, a strong sense that loss of ultimate responsibility is a grave loss remains even after considering the advantages of the rejection of justly deserved blame and punishment. Robert Kane and Saul Smilansky, two of the most profound proponents of moral responsibility, respond to this “loss” by ignoring it and considering what other loss comes about in denying ultimate responsibility that supports just deserts. Both philosophers concur that the loss to which they refer is a significant one.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses the repercussions of giving up the belief in moral responsibility and how this can negatively affect human life. Giving up the belief in moral responsibility entails also giving up the belief that blame and punishment can be justly deserved. The arguments in this chapter all make the case that this is a great benefit. However, a strong sense that loss of ultimate responsibility is a grave loss remains even after considering the advantages of the rejection of justly deserved blame and punishment. Robert Kane and Saul Smilansky, two of the most profound proponents of moral responsibility, respond to this “loss” by ignoring it and considering what other loss comes about in denying ultimate responsibility that supports just deserts. Both philosophers concur that the loss to which they refer is a significant one.

Key concepts: Blame, Moral responsibility, Punishment (psychology), Affect (linguistics), Law and economics, Environmental ethics, Psychology, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Creative Authorship without Ultimate Responsibility — Research Paper | ScholarLens