2015Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

DSM-5 and Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity and Diminished Mens Rea Defenses

Charles L. Scott

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Courts, defense attorneys, and prosecutors often request assistance from mental health professionals when a criminal defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense is at issue and the defendant enters a mental health defense. This chapter reviews the legal standards addressing the defense of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity, diminished capacity, and mens rea defenses. Because each of these defenses involves a retrospective analysis of a person’s mental state, evaluators should be familiar with the DSM-5, which represents the most current diagnostic guideline used in the United States. DSM-5 made several changes and additions to how mental disorders are defined, and the potential impact of these changes on the concepts of insanity and other mental health defenses are discussed. General guidelines for conducting an evaluation of a defendant’s criminal responsibility are also provided.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Courts, defense attorneys, and prosecutors often request assistance from mental health professionals when a criminal defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense is at issue and the defendant enters a mental health defense. This chapter reviews the legal standards addressing the defense of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity, diminished capacity, and mens rea defenses. Because each of these defenses involves a retrospective analysis of a person’s mental state, evaluators should be familiar with the DSM-5, which represents the most current diagnostic guideline used in the United States. DSM-5 made several changes and additions to how mental disorders are defined, and the potential impact of these changes on the concepts of insanity and other mental health defenses are discussed. General guidelines for conducting an evaluation of a defendant’s criminal responsibility are also provided.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Courts, defense attorneys, and prosecutors often request assistance from mental health professionals when a criminal defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense is at issue and the defendant enters a mental health defense. This chapter reviews the legal standards addressing the defense of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity, diminished capacity, and mens rea defenses. Because each of these defenses involves a retrospective analysis of a person’s mental state, evaluators should be familiar with the DSM-5, which represents the most current diagnostic guideline used in the United States. DSM-5 made several changes and additions to how mental disorders are defined, and the potential impact of these changes on the concepts of insanity and other mental health defenses are discussed. General guidelines for conducting an evaluation of a defendant’s criminal responsibility are also provided.

Key concepts: Mens rea, Insanity defense, Insanity, Diminished responsibility, Mental health, Psychology, State (computer science), Criminology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DSM-5 and Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity and Diminished Mens Rea Defenses — Research Paper | ScholarLens