2008Edinburgh University Press eBooksRequires access

Lacan: the name-of-the-father and the phallus

Lewis Michael

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter considers Jacques Lacan's early psychoanalytic theory in such a way as to demonstrate where and how it is vulnerable to deconstruction. Deconstruction concerns the relation between the text and the other of the text, the symbolic and the real. Lacan's own understanding of this relation may be reconstructed around two notions: the ‘name-of-the-father’ and the ‘phallus’. It is shown that the overwhelming tendency of Lacan's thought is to understand the relation between the real and the symbolic as an opposition. It then explores why a more ‘deconstructive’ notion of the relation is overwhelmed in this way. The phallus has two aspects: imaginary and symbolic. The phallus is an image of what stands at the very origin of the signifier. The name-of-the-father forces Lacan to adopt a transcendental rather than a genetic approach, and institutes a deconstructible relation between the real and the symbolic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter considers Jacques Lacan's early psychoanalytic theory in such a way as to demonstrate where and how it is vulnerable to deconstruction. Deconstruction concerns the relation between the text and the other of the text, the symbolic and the real. Lacan's own understanding of this relation may be reconstructed around two notions: the ‘name-of-the-father’ and the ‘phallus’. It is shown that the overwhelming tendency of Lacan's thought is to understand the relation between the real and the symbolic as an opposition. It then explores why a more ‘deconstructive’ notion of the relation is overwhelmed in this way. The phallus has two aspects: imaginary and symbolic. The phallus is an image of what stands at the very origin of the signifier. The name-of-the-father forces Lacan to adopt a transcendental rather than a genetic approach, and institutes a deconstructible relation between the real and the symbolic.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter considers Jacques Lacan's early psychoanalytic theory in such a way as to demonstrate where and how it is vulnerable to deconstruction. Deconstruction concerns the relation between the text and the other of the text, the symbolic and the real. Lacan's own understanding of this relation may be reconstructed around two notions: the ‘name-of-the-father’ and the ‘phallus’. It is shown that the overwhelming tendency of Lacan's thought is to understand the relation between the real and the symbolic as an opposition. It then explores why a more ‘deconstructive’ notion of the relation is overwhelmed in this way. The phallus has two aspects: imaginary and symbolic. The phallus is an image of what stands at the very origin of the signifier. The name-of-the-father forces Lacan to adopt a transcendental rather than a genetic approach, and institutes a deconstructible relation between the real and the symbolic.

Key concepts: Phallus (fungus), Genealogy, History, Psychoanalysis, Art, Psychology, Biology, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lacan: the name-of-the-father and the phallus — Research Paper | ScholarLens