Comparison of seed proteins in some representatives of the genusVigna
Věra Turková, Eva Klozová
Abstract
Věra Turková, Eva Klozová
Abstract
Seed protein patterns were compared in 10 species of the genusVigna, and in the generaMacroptilium, Strophostyles, Macrotyloma, Psophocarpus andPhaseolus. ThreeVigna groups could be clearly separated using immunochemical methods:Vigna hosei andVigna luteola;Vigna mungo, Vigna angularis, Vigna umbellata, Vigna trilobata andVigna radiata;Vigna sinensis,Vigna unquiculata andVigna aconitifolia. Among the other investigated generaPsophocarpus appears to be very distant, the others showing partial similarity in seed protein patterns.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Seed protein patterns were compared in 10 species of the genusVigna, and in the generaMacroptilium, Strophostyles, Macrotyloma, Psophocarpus andPhaseolus. ThreeVigna groups could be clearly separated using immunochemical methods:Vigna hosei andVigna luteola;Vigna mungo, Vigna angularis, Vigna umbellata, Vigna trilobata andVigna radiata;Vigna sinensis,Vigna unquiculata andVigna aconitifolia. Among the other investigated generaPsophocarpus appears to be very distant, the others showing partial similarity in seed protein patterns.
Key concepts: Vigna, Radiata, Biology, Botany