1974Unpublished venueRequires access

Gypsy moth : aerial tests with Bacillus thuringiensis and pyrethroids /

Harry K. Kaya

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Two formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner, Dipel® and Thuricide®-16B, and two synthetic pyrethroids, resmethrin (SBP-1382) and bioethanomethrin (RU 11679) were aerially tested against the gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (L.), in Connecticut.Dipel applied at the rate of 1 lb/acre or 7.26 Billion International Units (BIU)/acre and Thuricide-16B applied at the rate of 2 qt/acre or 8 BlU/acre provided some foliage protection.Pyrethroids applied at the rate of 0.05 lb active ingredi- ent/gal/acre did not provide foliage protection.The knock down rate was high, but many larvae recovered, ascended the trees, and continued to feed.There was a significant reduction in the number of egg masses per acre in the B. thuringiensis plots as compared to the untreated plots.The number of egg masses in plots treated with pyrethroids was not different from the untreated plots.There was a marked reduction in the posttreatment egg mass counts as compared with the pretreatment counts in all plots.In the B. thuringiensis plots the number of eggs per mass was sig- nificantly higher than in the untreated plots, but there was no significant difference in the number of eggs per mass be- H. Williams for their technical assistance.We especially thank the pilot, Mr. T.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner, Dipel® and Thuricide®-16B, and two synthetic pyrethroids, resmethrin (SBP-1382) and bioethanomethrin (RU 11679) were aerially tested against the gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (L.), in Connecticut.Dipel applied at the rate of 1 lb/acre or 7.26 Billion International Units (BIU)/acre and Thuricide-16B applied at the rate of 2 qt/acre or 8 BlU/acre provided some foliage protection.Pyrethroids applied at the rate of 0.05 lb active ingredi- ent/gal/acre did not provide foliage protection.The knock down rate was high, but many larvae recovered, ascended the trees, and continued to feed.There was a significant reduction in the number of egg masses per acre in the B. thuringiensis plots as compared to the untreated plots.The number of egg masses in plots treated with pyrethroids was not different from the untreated plots.There was a marked reduction in the posttreatment egg mass counts as compared with the pretreatment counts in all plots.In the B. thuringiensis plots the number of eggs per mass was sig- nificantly higher than in the untreated plots, but there was no significant difference in the number of eggs per mass be- H. Williams for their technical assistance.We especially thank the pilot, Mr. T.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner, Dipel® and Thuricide®-16B, and two synthetic pyrethroids, resmethrin (SBP-1382) and bioethanomethrin (RU 11679) were aerially tested against the gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (L.), in Connecticut.Dipel applied at the rate of 1 lb/acre or 7.26 Billion International Units (BIU)/acre and Thuricide-16B applied at the rate of 2 qt/acre or 8 BlU/acre provided some foliage protection.Pyrethroids applied at the rate of 0.05 lb active ingredi- ent/gal/acre did not provide foliage protection.The knock down rate was high, but many larvae recovered, ascended the trees, and continued to feed.There was a significant reduction in the number of egg masses per acre in the B. thuringiensis plots as compared to the untreated plots.The number of egg masses in plots treated with pyrethroids was not different from the untreated plots.There was a marked reduction in the posttreatment egg mass counts as compared with the pretreatment counts in all plots.In the B. thuringiensis plots the number of eggs per mass was sig- nificantly higher than in the untreated plots, but there was no significant difference in the number of eggs per mass be- H. Williams for their technical assistance.We especially thank the pilot, Mr. T.

Key concepts: Bacillus thuringiensis, Gypsy moth, Aerial application, Biology, Horticulture, Toxicology, Botany, Agronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gypsy moth : aerial tests with Bacillus thuringiensis and pyrethroids / — Research Paper | ScholarLens