Religious Liberty and Political Morality
Robert P. George
Abstract
Robert P. George
Abstract
This chapter defends the conception of religious liberty that is rooted in an appreciation of the nature of religion as a basic human good. Offering a natural law theory of religious freedom as an alternative to the more familiar liberal conceptions, the chapter notes, however, an important similarity between this book’s natural law argument for religious freedom and the Lockean liberal approach to the subject. It is argued here that it is a mistake to conclude, as many contemporary liberals do, that political authority must, in effect, profess agnosticism and concern itself not at all with people’s religious or spiritual well-being. An even worse mistake to make is to suppose that it is illegitimate for people to act on religious motivations in the creation of law and the formulation of public policy with respect to important issues of justice and human rights.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter defends the conception of religious liberty that is rooted in an appreciation of the nature of religion as a basic human good. Offering a natural law theory of religious freedom as an alternative to the more familiar liberal conceptions, the chapter notes, however, an important similarity between this book’s natural law argument for religious freedom and the Lockean liberal approach to the subject. It is argued here that it is a mistake to conclude, as many contemporary liberals do, that political authority must, in effect, profess agnosticism and concern itself not at all with people’s religious or spiritual well-being. An even worse mistake to make is to suppose that it is illegitimate for people to act on religious motivations in the creation of law and the formulation of public policy with respect to important issues of justice and human rights.
Key concepts: Mistake, Agnosticism, Politics, Argument (complex analysis), Morality, Law, Subject (documents), Political science