2004Research in labor economicsRequires access

Looking again at instrumental variable estimation of wage models in the gender wage gap literature

Astrid Kunze

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The evaluation of the gender wage gap centers on the consistent estimation of the parameters of interest in a human capital wage regression model. In previous studies, the consistency of the parameter estimates often depends on the restrictive assumptions of strict exogeneity and mean stationarity of corresponding explanatory variables in the model. This applies, particularly, to the work history variables, that is the work experience and the time out of work variable. In this paper, we specify a wage model that allows these variables to be predetermined and discuss consistent estimation by generalised method of moments estimators. For estimation, we use a new longitudinal administrative data set with particularly advantageous features to measure the main variables, i.e. wages and human capital. Our results show that wage models estimated in levels and using first differences of the endogenous regressors as instruments are not valid.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The evaluation of the gender wage gap centers on the consistent estimation of the parameters of interest in a human capital wage regression model. In previous studies, the consistency of the parameter estimates often depends on the restrictive assumptions of strict exogeneity and mean stationarity of corresponding explanatory variables in the model. This applies, particularly, to the work history variables, that is the work experience and the time out of work variable. In this paper, we specify a wage model that allows these variables to be predetermined and discuss consistent estimation by generalised method of moments estimators. For estimation, we use a new longitudinal administrative data set with particularly advantageous features to measure the main variables, i.e. wages and human capital. Our results show that wage models estimated in levels and using first differences of the endogenous regressors as instruments are not valid.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The evaluation of the gender wage gap centers on the consistent estimation of the parameters of interest in a human capital wage regression model. In previous studies, the consistency of the parameter estimates often depends on the restrictive assumptions of strict exogeneity and mean stationarity of corresponding explanatory variables in the model. This applies, particularly, to the work history variables, that is the work experience and the time out of work variable. In this paper, we specify a wage model that allows these variables to be predetermined and discuss consistent estimation by generalised method of moments estimators. For estimation, we use a new longitudinal administrative data set with particularly advantageous features to measure the main variables, i.e. wages and human capital. Our results show that wage models estimated in levels and using first differences of the endogenous regressors as instruments are not valid.

Key concepts: Endogeneity, Instrumental variable, Wage, Estimator, Econometrics, Estimation, Economics, Human capital

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Looking again at instrumental variable estimation of wage models in the gender wage gap literature — Research Paper | ScholarLens