1986•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Privileging Literary Criticism: the Legacy of F. R. Leavis’s The Great Tradition

Daniel R. Schwarz

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

American academics have often been puzzled by claims made by English colleagues for the importance of F. R. Leavis. Leavis’s position as a literary critic cannot be separated from his role as leader of an academic revolution in England which established literary criticism as a central activity in British culture. Leavis’s premise was, as he argues in Education and the University (1943), that literary criticism ‘trains, in a way no other discipline can, intelligence and sensibility together, cultivating a sensitiveness and precision of response and a delicate integrity of intelligence — intelligence that integrates as well as analyses and must have pertinacity and staying power as well as delicacy’. 1 For Leavis, literary criticism involves the complete engagement of mind and feeling while reading a text, and the subsequent ability to recreate or render that response in writing. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

American academics have often been puzzled by claims made by English colleagues for the importance of F. R. Leavis. Leavis’s position as a literary critic cannot be separated from his role as leader of an academic revolution in England which established literary criticism as a central activity in British culture. Leavis’s premise was, as he argues in Education and the University (1943), that literary criticism ‘trains, in a way no other discipline can, intelligence and sensibility together, cultivating a sensitiveness and precision of response and a delicate integrity of intelligence — intelligence that integrates as well as analyses and must have pertinacity and staying power as well as delicacy’. 1 For Leavis, literary criticism involves the complete engagement of mind and feeling while reading a text, and the subsequent ability to recreate or render that response in writing. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

American academics have often been puzzled by claims made by English colleagues for the importance of F. R. Leavis. Leavis’s position as a literary critic cannot be separated from his role as leader of an academic revolution in England which established literary criticism as a central activity in British culture. Leavis’s premise was, as he argues in Education and the University (1943), that literary criticism ‘trains, in a way no other discipline can, intelligence and sensibility together, cultivating a sensitiveness and precision of response and a delicate integrity of intelligence — intelligence that integrates as well as analyses and must have pertinacity and staying power as well as delicacy’. 1 For Leavis, literary criticism involves the complete engagement of mind and feeling while reading a text, and the subsequent ability to recreate or render that response in writing. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Literary criticism, Delicacy, Criticism, Premise, Sensibility, Feeling, Literary science, Literature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Privileging Literary Criticism: the Legacy of F. R. Leavis’s The Great Tradition — Research Paper | ScholarLens