2005•Unpublished venueRequires access

Capital Account Liberalization: The Indian Experience

Narendra Jadhav

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

When India and China successfully withstood the contagion from the East Asian crisis in 1997, the relatively restrictive capital account regime of these two countries was generally highlighted as the savior. Unlike the pre-crisis period when capital controls were generally viewed as a taboo, policy thinking in the post-crisis period has changed dramatically, with several emerging market economies slowing down the pace and content of liberalization of capital controls with a view to limiting their vulnerability to crisis. The benefits and costs of an open capital account appear more ambiguous today than what many researchers and policymakers had believed in the pre-crisis period. In this context, the approach to capital account liberalization as adopted by India and China has become an important subject of international policy discussions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When India and China successfully withstood the contagion from the East Asian crisis in 1997, the relatively restrictive capital account regime of these two countries was generally highlighted as the savior. Unlike the pre-crisis period when capital controls were generally viewed as a taboo, policy thinking in the post-crisis period has changed dramatically, with several emerging market economies slowing down the pace and content of liberalization of capital controls with a view to limiting their vulnerability to crisis. The benefits and costs of an open capital account appear more ambiguous today than what many researchers and policymakers had believed in the pre-crisis period. In this context, the approach to capital account liberalization as adopted by India and China has become an important subject of international policy discussions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When India and China successfully withstood the contagion from the East Asian crisis in 1997, the relatively restrictive capital account regime of these two countries was generally highlighted as the savior. Unlike the pre-crisis period when capital controls were generally viewed as a taboo, policy thinking in the post-crisis period has changed dramatically, with several emerging market economies slowing down the pace and content of liberalization of capital controls with a view to limiting their vulnerability to crisis. The benefits and costs of an open capital account appear more ambiguous today than what many researchers and policymakers had believed in the pre-crisis period. In this context, the approach to capital account liberalization as adopted by India and China has become an important subject of international policy discussions.

Key concepts: Liberalization, Economics, Capital (architecture), Pace, Capital account, Context (archaeology), China, International economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Capital Account Liberalization: The Indian Experience — Research Paper | ScholarLens