2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Commentaries on Revelation

Lois Katharine Dow

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter begins with a historical survey that reveals how much influence the historical context of the interpreter has had on interpretations of the book of Revelation. This is so for the interpretation of any piece of literature, but especially for a work like Revelation that is full of symbolism and believed to be normative for readers of every era. The majority of scholarly Bible commentaries, including those on Revelation, are written for the use of the church in preaching and teaching. The scholarly consensus today is that the historical-critical method gives the most accurate interpretation of the text of Revelation. There are a number of things to consider in any Revelation commentary: commentary size; its evaluation of Revelation's genre; the date of Revelation's composition; how to interpret the symbolism; Revelation's outline; commentator's ideological stance; and the commentary's application strategy. The chapter closes with comments on seven recent commentaries. Keywords:Bible commentaries; Jesus Christ; Revelation

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter begins with a historical survey that reveals how much influence the historical context of the interpreter has had on interpretations of the book of Revelation. This is so for the interpretation of any piece of literature, but especially for a work like Revelation that is full of symbolism and believed to be normative for readers of every era. The majority of scholarly Bible commentaries, including those on Revelation, are written for the use of the church in preaching and teaching. The scholarly consensus today is that the historical-critical method gives the most accurate interpretation of the text of Revelation. There are a number of things to consider in any Revelation commentary: commentary size; its evaluation of Revelation's genre; the date of Revelation's composition; how to interpret the symbolism; Revelation's outline; commentator's ideological stance; and the commentary's application strategy. The chapter closes with comments on seven recent commentaries. Keywords:Bible commentaries; Jesus Christ; Revelation

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter begins with a historical survey that reveals how much influence the historical context of the interpreter has had on interpretations of the book of Revelation. This is so for the interpretation of any piece of literature, but especially for a work like Revelation that is full of symbolism and believed to be normative for readers of every era. The majority of scholarly Bible commentaries, including those on Revelation, are written for the use of the church in preaching and teaching. The scholarly consensus today is that the historical-critical method gives the most accurate interpretation of the text of Revelation. There are a number of things to consider in any Revelation commentary: commentary size; its evaluation of Revelation's genre; the date of Revelation's composition; how to interpret the symbolism; Revelation's outline; commentator's ideological stance; and the commentary's application strategy. The chapter closes with comments on seven recent commentaries. Keywords:Bible commentaries; Jesus Christ; Revelation

Key concepts: Revelation, Interpretation (philosophy), Interpreter, Context (archaeology), Philosophy, Literature, Ideology, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Commentaries on Revelation — Research Paper | ScholarLens