2015Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Time in International Law and Arbitration

Francisco Orrego Vicuña

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter offers insight into the often complicated impact of time on jurisdictional and substantive requirements under investment treaties. Issues of temporal jurisdiction versus the temporal scope of substantive provisions continue to divide and at times confuse the reasoning of investment treaty tribunals. A case survey confirms that the principle of non-retroactivity remains sacrosanct, with the exception of composite acts that begin before the effective date of a treaty and conclude after that date. The chapter also comments on certain special scenarios, such as the provisional application of the Energy Charter Treaty, the timing of investments for purposes of jurisdiction, and composite acts arising under both customary international law and the lex specialis represented by the treaty.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter offers insight into the often complicated impact of time on jurisdictional and substantive requirements under investment treaties. Issues of temporal jurisdiction versus the temporal scope of substantive provisions continue to divide and at times confuse the reasoning of investment treaty tribunals. A case survey confirms that the principle of non-retroactivity remains sacrosanct, with the exception of composite acts that begin before the effective date of a treaty and conclude after that date. The chapter also comments on certain special scenarios, such as the provisional application of the Energy Charter Treaty, the timing of investments for purposes of jurisdiction, and composite acts arising under both customary international law and the lex specialis represented by the treaty.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter offers insight into the often complicated impact of time on jurisdictional and substantive requirements under investment treaties. Issues of temporal jurisdiction versus the temporal scope of substantive provisions continue to divide and at times confuse the reasoning of investment treaty tribunals. A case survey confirms that the principle of non-retroactivity remains sacrosanct, with the exception of composite acts that begin before the effective date of a treaty and conclude after that date. The chapter also comments on certain special scenarios, such as the provisional application of the Energy Charter Treaty, the timing of investments for purposes of jurisdiction, and composite acts arising under both customary international law and the lex specialis represented by the treaty.

Key concepts: Arbitration, Law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Time in International Law and Arbitration — Research Paper | ScholarLens