2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Aristotle’s Proofs of Conversions and Syllogisms

Terence D. Parsons

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract In Prior Analytics Aristotle proves the conversion principles, using three logical techniques: reductio (indirect derivation), exposition (a kind of existential instantiation: given ‘Some S is a P’, introduce a previously unused name m, and write ‘m is an S’ and ‘m is a P’), and expository syllogism (given ‘m is a P’ and ‘m is an S’ infer ‘Some S is a P’). He assumes four basic forms of syllogism, and uses them together with reductio, exposition, and expository syllogisms to prove the remaining forms. The four basic forms can be proved too, though this was unknown to him or to medieval logicians. Monotonicity properties of the determiners ‘every’, ‘no’, and ‘some’ are explained; Aristotle’s four basic argument forms allow easy proofs of their monotonicity properties. By the 13th century a memorizable verse was developed that encodes Aristotle’s validation of all syllogistic forms from the basic four.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In Prior Analytics Aristotle proves the conversion principles, using three logical techniques: reductio (indirect derivation), exposition (a kind of existential instantiation: given ‘Some S is a P’, introduce a previously unused name m, and write ‘m is an S’ and ‘m is a P’), and expository syllogism (given ‘m is a P’ and ‘m is an S’ infer ‘Some S is a P’). He assumes four basic forms of syllogism, and uses them together with reductio, exposition, and expository syllogisms to prove the remaining forms. The four basic forms can be proved too, though this was unknown to him or to medieval logicians. Monotonicity properties of the determiners ‘every’, ‘no’, and ‘some’ are explained; Aristotle’s four basic argument forms allow easy proofs of their monotonicity properties. By the 13th century a memorizable verse was developed that encodes Aristotle’s validation of all syllogistic forms from the basic four.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In Prior Analytics Aristotle proves the conversion principles, using three logical techniques: reductio (indirect derivation), exposition (a kind of existential instantiation: given ‘Some S is a P’, introduce a previously unused name m, and write ‘m is an S’ and ‘m is a P’), and expository syllogism (given ‘m is a P’ and ‘m is an S’ infer ‘Some S is a P’). He assumes four basic forms of syllogism, and uses them together with reductio, exposition, and expository syllogisms to prove the remaining forms. The four basic forms can be proved too, though this was unknown to him or to medieval logicians. Monotonicity properties of the determiners ‘every’, ‘no’, and ‘some’ are explained; Aristotle’s four basic argument forms allow easy proofs of their monotonicity properties. By the 13th century a memorizable verse was developed that encodes Aristotle’s validation of all syllogistic forms from the basic four.

Key concepts: Syllogism, Reductio ad absurdum, Exposition (narrative), Mathematical proof, Argument (complex analysis), Philosophy, Monotonic function, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Aristotle’s Proofs of Conversions and Syllogisms — Research Paper | ScholarLens