2015•SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)Open access

Tax Anti-Avoidance Law in Australia and the United States

Susan C. Morse, R. L. Deutsch

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

42 (1988) (arguing that using rules assigns jurisdiction to past decision makers at the expense of future decision makers).2. See, e.g., C.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

42 (1988) (arguing that using rules assigns jurisdiction to past decision makers at the expense of future decision makers).2. See, e.g., C.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

42 (1988) (arguing that using rules assigns jurisdiction to past decision makers at the expense of future decision makers).2. See, e.g., C.

Key concepts: Tax avoidance, Tax law, Law, Political science, Business, Economics, Law and economics, Double taxation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tax Anti-Avoidance Law in Australia and the United States — Research Paper | ScholarLens