1944Unpublished venueOpen access

An annotated synopsis of paleozoic fossil spores : and the definition of generic groups

James M. Schopf, L. R. Wilson, Ray Bentall

Open full text 229 citations

Abstract

partial synonymy" undoubtedly record close natural relationship, but the names should not be regarded as invalid unless shown to be mutually inclusive.Lacking this, they remain applicable to fossils con- specific with their basic nomenclatural types.For the research worker there are advantages in this conservative view of synonymy, as it tends to promote a more precise differentiation of fossils.This basically, is a fundamental reason for the continued use of technical nomenclature, necessary to progress in the study of fossil plants.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

partial synonymy" undoubtedly record close natural relationship, but the names should not be regarded as invalid unless shown to be mutually inclusive.Lacking this, they remain applicable to fossils con- specific with their basic nomenclatural types.For the research worker there are advantages in this conservative view of synonymy, as it tends to promote a more precise differentiation of fossils.This basically, is a fundamental reason for the continued use of technical nomenclature, necessary to progress in the study of fossil plants.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 229 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

partial synonymy" undoubtedly record close natural relationship, but the names should not be regarded as invalid unless shown to be mutually inclusive.Lacking this, they remain applicable to fossils con- specific with their basic nomenclatural types.For the research worker there are advantages in this conservative view of synonymy, as it tends to promote a more precise differentiation of fossils.This basically, is a fundamental reason for the continued use of technical nomenclature, necessary to progress in the study of fossil plants.

Key concepts: Paleozoic, Nomenclature, Paleontology, Natural (archaeology), Fossil Record, Genealogy, Geography, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An annotated synopsis of paleozoic fossil spores : and the definition of generic groups — Research Paper | ScholarLens