An annotated synopsis of paleozoic fossil spores : and the definition of generic groups
James M. Schopf, L. R. Wilson, Ray Bentall
Abstract
James M. Schopf, L. R. Wilson, Ray Bentall
Abstract
partial synonymy" undoubtedly record close natural relationship, but the names should not be regarded as invalid unless shown to be mutually inclusive.Lacking this, they remain applicable to fossils con- specific with their basic nomenclatural types.For the research worker there are advantages in this conservative view of synonymy, as it tends to promote a more precise differentiation of fossils.This basically, is a fundamental reason for the continued use of technical nomenclature, necessary to progress in the study of fossil plants.
OpenAlex reports 229 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
partial synonymy" undoubtedly record close natural relationship, but the names should not be regarded as invalid unless shown to be mutually inclusive.Lacking this, they remain applicable to fossils con- specific with their basic nomenclatural types.For the research worker there are advantages in this conservative view of synonymy, as it tends to promote a more precise differentiation of fossils.This basically, is a fundamental reason for the continued use of technical nomenclature, necessary to progress in the study of fossil plants.
Key concepts: Paleozoic, Nomenclature, Paleontology, Natural (archaeology), Fossil Record, Genealogy, Geography, Biology