Paradoxes of Property
Joseph William Singer
Abstract
Joseph William Singer
Abstract
This chapter explores the paradoxes and problems that can be encountered when dealing with property rights and property laws. It looks at, for example, how interests in the free use of property can apparently conflict with interests in security. It reflects on the case of Friendswood. In this case, withdrawing water directly affected and caused harm to neighbors of Friendswood. The case of Friendswood points out however, that property was being used in a lawful manner. Accordingly, a judge might rule in favor of Friendswood because the neighbors acted negligently in building homes in an area that was prone to flooding or to sinkholes. Thus, the Friendswood case demonstrates a fundamental conflict that a judge may face when confronted with these two distinct property rights: the right to use one's property as one sees fit, and the right not to have one's property physically invaded or destroyed by others.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter explores the paradoxes and problems that can be encountered when dealing with property rights and property laws. It looks at, for example, how interests in the free use of property can apparently conflict with interests in security. It reflects on the case of Friendswood. In this case, withdrawing water directly affected and caused harm to neighbors of Friendswood. The case of Friendswood points out however, that property was being used in a lawful manner. Accordingly, a judge might rule in favor of Friendswood because the neighbors acted negligently in building homes in an area that was prone to flooding or to sinkholes. Thus, the Friendswood case demonstrates a fundamental conflict that a judge may face when confronted with these two distinct property rights: the right to use one's property as one sees fit, and the right not to have one's property physically invaded or destroyed by others.
Key concepts: Property (philosophy), Harm, Sinkhole, Law and economics, Property rights, Face (sociological concept), Political science, Law