2014Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

Rawls’s Starting Point

Gary Chartier

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Rawls offers an account of global justice and the grounds of global law expressed in what he calls “the Law of Peoples.”1 Peoples are like states, but they lack some of the more obviously dubious features of states (Part II). It is representatives of peoples whose deliberation in a (two-part) global version of Rawls’s familiar “original position” yields the content of the Law of Peoples; thus, Rawls’s approach treats peoples as basic to a just global order (Part III). Such a Law would contain what Rawls takes to be the most crucial elements of a refined version of current international law (Part IV). The broad category of “well-ordered” peoples includes both liberal peoples and those Rawls calls “decent nonliberal” peoples (Part V). Rawls’s adoption of a people- based approach leads to conclusions that are less appealing from the standpoint of individuals around the globe than a cosmopolitan alternative (Part VI). His entire project, organized around the needs and concerns of peoples, reflects the features of his starting point (Part VII).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rawls offers an account of global justice and the grounds of global law expressed in what he calls “the Law of Peoples.”1 Peoples are like states, but they lack some of the more obviously dubious features of states (Part II). It is representatives of peoples whose deliberation in a (two-part) global version of Rawls’s familiar “original position” yields the content of the Law of Peoples; thus, Rawls’s approach treats peoples as basic to a just global order (Part III). Such a Law would contain what Rawls takes to be the most crucial elements of a refined version of current international law (Part IV). The broad category of “well-ordered” peoples includes both liberal peoples and those Rawls calls “decent nonliberal” peoples (Part V). Rawls’s adoption of a people- based approach leads to conclusions that are less appealing from the standpoint of individuals around the globe than a cosmopolitan alternative (Part VI). His entire project, organized around the needs and concerns of peoples, reflects the features of his starting point (Part VII).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rawls offers an account of global justice and the grounds of global law expressed in what he calls “the Law of Peoples.”1 Peoples are like states, but they lack some of the more obviously dubious features of states (Part II). It is representatives of peoples whose deliberation in a (two-part) global version of Rawls’s familiar “original position” yields the content of the Law of Peoples; thus, Rawls’s approach treats peoples as basic to a just global order (Part III). Such a Law would contain what Rawls takes to be the most crucial elements of a refined version of current international law (Part IV). The broad category of “well-ordered” peoples includes both liberal peoples and those Rawls calls “decent nonliberal” peoples (Part V). Rawls’s adoption of a people- based approach leads to conclusions that are less appealing from the standpoint of individuals around the globe than a cosmopolitan alternative (Part VI). His entire project, organized around the needs and concerns of peoples, reflects the features of his starting point (Part VII).

Key concepts: Deliberation, Original position, Globe, Economic Justice, Global justice, Political science, Law, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rawls’s Starting Point — Research Paper | ScholarLens