2013Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

War, Revolution and the Great Depression in the Global Wheat Trade, 1917–39

Gregory P. Marchildon

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

As Francine McKenzie pointed out in her Introduction to this volume, there is a reciprocal relationship between trade and conflict: while trade can ignite conflict so, too, can conflict reshape trade. The international wheat trade during the interwar period of the twentieth century provides a graphic illustration of this relationship. The First World War and the Russian Revolution ruptured existing trade patterns such that only four countries outside the areas of armed conflict — United States, Canada, Argentina and Australia — dominated the export trade until the Second World War. At the same time, the exigencies of world depression combined with preparations for further conflict put a premium on food security and autarkic economic policy. This intensified existing rivalries among the Big Four wheat exporters and the resulting international wheat glut was instrumental in accelerating protectionism and creating trade blocs. The desire for domestic control over food supplies lay behind the Japanese Empire’s invasion of Manchuria and repopulation of the regions with Japanese landowners and farmers, as well as Nazi Germany’s Lebensraum policy to enslave and kill Slavic populations in Eastern Europe and Russia and use the vacated lands to create an agricultural surplus for Germans. 1

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As Francine McKenzie pointed out in her Introduction to this volume, there is a reciprocal relationship between trade and conflict: while trade can ignite conflict so, too, can conflict reshape trade. The international wheat trade during the interwar period of the twentieth century provides a graphic illustration of this relationship. The First World War and the Russian Revolution ruptured existing trade patterns such that only four countries outside the areas of armed conflict — United States, Canada, Argentina and Australia — dominated the export trade until the Second World War. At the same time, the exigencies of world depression combined with preparations for further conflict put a premium on food security and autarkic economic policy. This intensified existing rivalries among the Big Four wheat exporters and the resulting international wheat glut was instrumental in accelerating protectionism and creating trade blocs. The desire for domestic control over food supplies lay behind the Japanese Empire’s invasion of Manchuria and repopulation of the regions with Japanese landowners and farmers, as well as Nazi Germany’s Lebensraum policy to enslave and kill Slavic populations in Eastern Europe and Russia and use the vacated lands to create an agricultural surplus for Germans. 1

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As Francine McKenzie pointed out in her Introduction to this volume, there is a reciprocal relationship between trade and conflict: while trade can ignite conflict so, too, can conflict reshape trade. The international wheat trade during the interwar period of the twentieth century provides a graphic illustration of this relationship. The First World War and the Russian Revolution ruptured existing trade patterns such that only four countries outside the areas of armed conflict — United States, Canada, Argentina and Australia — dominated the export trade until the Second World War. At the same time, the exigencies of world depression combined with preparations for further conflict put a premium on food security and autarkic economic policy. This intensified existing rivalries among the Big Four wheat exporters and the resulting international wheat glut was instrumental in accelerating protectionism and creating trade blocs. The desire for domestic control over food supplies lay behind the Japanese Empire’s invasion of Manchuria and repopulation of the regions with Japanese landowners and farmers, as well as Nazi Germany’s Lebensraum policy to enslave and kill Slavic populations in Eastern Europe and Russia and use the vacated lands to create an agricultural surplus for Germans. 1

Key concepts: Great Depression, Depression (economics), History, Psychology, Economics, Keynesian economics, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
War, Revolution and the Great Depression in the Global Wheat Trade, 1917–39 — Research Paper | ScholarLens