2015•Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

Privacy: A Personal Sphere, Not Home-Bound

Amitaï Etzioni

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

“[T]he Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected.” So stated the Supreme Court majority in Katz v. United States 1 in 1969. This chapter builds on this statement and attempts to show that it has generally gone unheeded in Fourth Amendment case law since 1969, and that sweeping and significant technological advances mean that the statement is more valuable than ever. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

“[T]he Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected.” So stated the Supreme Court majority in Katz v. United States 1 in 1969. This chapter builds on this statement and attempts to show that it has generally gone unheeded in Fourth Amendment case law since 1969, and that sweeping and significant technological advances mean that the statement is more valuable than ever. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

“[T]he Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected.” So stated the Supreme Court majority in Katz v. United States 1 in 1969. This chapter builds on this statement and attempts to show that it has generally gone unheeded in Fourth Amendment case law since 1969, and that sweeping and significant technological advances mean that the statement is more valuable than ever. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Statement (logic), Supreme court, Law, Subject (documents), Political science, First amendment, Computer science, Library science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Privacy: A Personal Sphere, Not Home-Bound — Research Paper | ScholarLens