Assessing the debris risk from the avalanche of CubeSats
Michael A. Swartwout
Abstract
Michael A. Swartwout
Abstract
In the past five years, the CubeSat class of spacecraft has grown from an easily-ignored `toy' of universities to the most common type of spacecraft launched. With so many spacecraft released on-orbit in such a short time, it is natural to worry about the increased risk of collisions due to CubeSats. Fears of a CubeSat-driven “catastrophe” have surfaced in the trade publications and at symposia. But, are these concerns grounded in data? Using publicly-available orbit data, and the author's own CubeSat database, a numbers-driven examination of CubeSat debris risks will be presented. It will be shown that CubeSats comprise a very small fraction of the objects in orbits of interest. Moreover, rocket bodies and fragmentation debris comprise the dominant sources of collision risk - an assertion borne out by the evidence of collisions to date. Also, it will be shown that NASA/DoD's current policy towards CubeSats (i.e., placing them in naturally-decaying orbits, with lifetimes of less than 7 years) is quite effective in mitigating CubeSat collision risks in the short term. In fact, only a few international launches are responsible for the preponderance of long-orbit-life CubeSats. This paper will conclude with a brief review of other debris mitigation strategies and their possible consequences, based on this study of the orbit data.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the past five years, the CubeSat class of spacecraft has grown from an easily-ignored `toy' of universities to the most common type of spacecraft launched. With so many spacecraft released on-orbit in such a short time, it is natural to worry about the increased risk of collisions due to CubeSats. Fears of a CubeSat-driven “catastrophe” have surfaced in the trade publications and at symposia. But, are these concerns grounded in data? Using publicly-available orbit data, and the author's own CubeSat database, a numbers-driven examination of CubeSat debris risks will be presented. It will be shown that CubeSats comprise a very small fraction of the objects in orbits of interest. Moreover, rocket bodies and fragmentation debris comprise the dominant sources of collision risk - an assertion borne out by the evidence of collisions to date. Also, it will be shown that NASA/DoD's current policy towards CubeSats (i.e., placing them in naturally-decaying orbits, with lifetimes of less than 7 years) is quite effective in mitigating CubeSat collision risks in the short term. In fact, only a few international launches are responsible for the preponderance of long-orbit-life CubeSats. This paper will conclude with a brief review of other debris mitigation strategies and their possible consequences, based on this study of the orbit data.
Key concepts: Debris, Computer science, Aeronautics, Environmental science, Meteorology, Engineering, Geography