2014Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Reasons and Moral Relativism

Julia Markovits

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter introduces the internalist account of what reasons are, according to which what we have reason to do depends in some way on our antecedent desires, contrasting it with externalism about reasons. Drawing on the internalist views of David Hume and Bernard Williams, it sets out the worry that accepting internalism about reasons commits us to moral relativism. Indeed, Gilbert Harman embraced such relativism on internalist grounds. The chapter considers and rejects one way to resist Harman’s relativist conclusions (endorsed at times by Williams and Philippa Foot): abandoning the tie between what we morally ought to do and what we have reason to do. We seem to be left with a choice: we must accept moral relativism, or reject internalism about reasons.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter introduces the internalist account of what reasons are, according to which what we have reason to do depends in some way on our antecedent desires, contrasting it with externalism about reasons. Drawing on the internalist views of David Hume and Bernard Williams, it sets out the worry that accepting internalism about reasons commits us to moral relativism. Indeed, Gilbert Harman embraced such relativism on internalist grounds. The chapter considers and rejects one way to resist Harman’s relativist conclusions (endorsed at times by Williams and Philippa Foot): abandoning the tie between what we morally ought to do and what we have reason to do. We seem to be left with a choice: we must accept moral relativism, or reject internalism about reasons.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter introduces the internalist account of what reasons are, according to which what we have reason to do depends in some way on our antecedent desires, contrasting it with externalism about reasons. Drawing on the internalist views of David Hume and Bernard Williams, it sets out the worry that accepting internalism about reasons commits us to moral relativism. Indeed, Gilbert Harman embraced such relativism on internalist grounds. The chapter considers and rejects one way to resist Harman’s relativist conclusions (endorsed at times by Williams and Philippa Foot): abandoning the tie between what we morally ought to do and what we have reason to do. We seem to be left with a choice: we must accept moral relativism, or reject internalism about reasons.

Key concepts: Internalism and externalism, Relativism, Moral relativism, Externalism, Epistemology, Philosophy, Antecedent (behavioral psychology), Worry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reasons and Moral Relativism — Research Paper | ScholarLens