2013•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Exogenous Breakdown: The Institutional, Socioeconomic and Political Causes of Democratic Termination

Mark Chou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter draws the reader’s attention to the conventional position typically put forward by democratic advocates when confronted with the claim that democracy is inherently predisposed to self-destruct. It argues that for those whose work centres around the issue of weak, failing or failed democracies, the focus has generally been directed toward extrinsic – or exogenous – factors that impact upon democracy from the outside. Not only that, but it claims that the large majority of these works tend only to examine democratic failure as part of the early stages of the transition towards democracy. Few studies, to this end, examine the collapse of mature or strong democracies – in part because of the widely held assumption that mature or strong democracies are almost near impenetrable to attack. In this sense, the general tendency has been to approach democratic breakdowns as an anomaly whose true source stem from such factors as economic instability and inequality, inappropriate or ineffective institutional frameworks or the existence of intractable ethnic divisions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter draws the reader’s attention to the conventional position typically put forward by democratic advocates when confronted with the claim that democracy is inherently predisposed to self-destruct. It argues that for those whose work centres around the issue of weak, failing or failed democracies, the focus has generally been directed toward extrinsic – or exogenous – factors that impact upon democracy from the outside. Not only that, but it claims that the large majority of these works tend only to examine democratic failure as part of the early stages of the transition towards democracy. Few studies, to this end, examine the collapse of mature or strong democracies – in part because of the widely held assumption that mature or strong democracies are almost near impenetrable to attack. In this sense, the general tendency has been to approach democratic breakdowns as an anomaly whose true source stem from such factors as economic instability and inequality, inappropriate or ineffective institutional frameworks or the existence of intractable ethnic divisions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter draws the reader’s attention to the conventional position typically put forward by democratic advocates when confronted with the claim that democracy is inherently predisposed to self-destruct. It argues that for those whose work centres around the issue of weak, failing or failed democracies, the focus has generally been directed toward extrinsic – or exogenous – factors that impact upon democracy from the outside. Not only that, but it claims that the large majority of these works tend only to examine democratic failure as part of the early stages of the transition towards democracy. Few studies, to this end, examine the collapse of mature or strong democracies – in part because of the widely held assumption that mature or strong democracies are almost near impenetrable to attack. In this sense, the general tendency has been to approach democratic breakdowns as an anomaly whose true source stem from such factors as economic instability and inequality, inappropriate or ineffective institutional frameworks or the existence of intractable ethnic divisions.

Key concepts: Democracy, Political economy, Politics, Political science, Position (finance), Socioeconomic status, Inequality, Development economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Exogenous Breakdown: The Institutional, Socioeconomic and Political Causes of Democratic Termination — Research Paper | ScholarLens