2012•Unpublished venueRequires access

Balance Sheets of Banks and Insurance Companies

Frans de Weert

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Banks and insurance companies have one thing in common that they both fulfil very important social functions and the business they do with customers is reflected at the liability side of their balance sheets. This contrasts with regular business models, which are purely asset driven. This means that customers want to do business with nonfinancial companies because of their abilities and outputs that are reflected at the asset side of their balance sheets. Generally, the balance sheet of a bank is either liability driven or asset driven. An asset-driven balance sheet is less common for retail banks, but more common for investment banks. In addition, when a balance sheet is liability driven, client activity at the liability side drives the structure and size of the balance sheet. There are several different bank business models with either asset-driven or liability-driven balance sheets. Nevertheless, the general balance sheet structure is similar, because banks have sought to diversify themselves at both the asset and liability sides of the balance sheet. However, the balance sheet structure of an insurance company shows similarities with that of a bank. The biggest difference is that the balance sheet of an insurance company is completely liability driven; in other words, client activity of an insurance company does not take place at the asset side of the balance sheet. This chapter also discusses the difference in structure of an insurance company to that of a bank.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Banks and insurance companies have one thing in common that they both fulfil very important social functions and the business they do with customers is reflected at the liability side of their balance sheets. This contrasts with regular business models, which are purely asset driven. This means that customers want to do business with nonfinancial companies because of their abilities and outputs that are reflected at the asset side of their balance sheets. Generally, the balance sheet of a bank is either liability driven or asset driven. An asset-driven balance sheet is less common for retail banks, but more common for investment banks. In addition, when a balance sheet is liability driven, client activity at the liability side drives the structure and size of the balance sheet. There are several different bank business models with either asset-driven or liability-driven balance sheets. Nevertheless, the general balance sheet structure is similar, because banks have sought to diversify themselves at both the asset and liability sides of the balance sheet. However, the balance sheet structure of an insurance company shows similarities with that of a bank. The biggest difference is that the balance sheet of an insurance company is completely liability driven; in other words, client activity of an insurance company does not take place at the asset side of the balance sheet. This chapter also discusses the difference in structure of an insurance company to that of a bank.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Banks and insurance companies have one thing in common that they both fulfil very important social functions and the business they do with customers is reflected at the liability side of their balance sheets. This contrasts with regular business models, which are purely asset driven. This means that customers want to do business with nonfinancial companies because of their abilities and outputs that are reflected at the asset side of their balance sheets. Generally, the balance sheet of a bank is either liability driven or asset driven. An asset-driven balance sheet is less common for retail banks, but more common for investment banks. In addition, when a balance sheet is liability driven, client activity at the liability side drives the structure and size of the balance sheet. There are several different bank business models with either asset-driven or liability-driven balance sheets. Nevertheless, the general balance sheet structure is similar, because banks have sought to diversify themselves at both the asset and liability sides of the balance sheet. However, the balance sheet structure of an insurance company shows similarities with that of a bank. The biggest difference is that the balance sheet of an insurance company is completely liability driven; in other words, client activity of an insurance company does not take place at the asset side of the balance sheet. This chapter also discusses the difference in structure of an insurance company to that of a bank.

Key concepts: Balance sheet, Liability, Off-balance-sheet, Asset (computer security), Business, Balance (ability), Finance, Actuarial science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Balance Sheets of Banks and Insurance Companies — Research Paper | ScholarLens