Glycemic Control and Diabetic Complications—Is the Predominant Current Rationale Rational?
Harold E. Lebovitz
Abstract
Open-access reader
Harold E. Lebovitz
Abstract
Open-access reader
Although the level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1C ) reflects chronic glycemic control, treatment-induced decreases in HbA 1C in patients who have established diabetes do not always predict beneficial clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes are dramatically influenced by the history of previous glycemic control, the extent of current clinical complications, and the side effects of therapeutic agents. Rational approaches to the intensity of glycemic control in individual patients should take these factors into consideration, as well as in setting an appropriate goal for the HbA 1C target.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Although the level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1C ) reflects chronic glycemic control, treatment-induced decreases in HbA 1C in patients who have established diabetes do not always predict beneficial clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes are dramatically influenced by the history of previous glycemic control, the extent of current clinical complications, and the side effects of therapeutic agents. Rational approaches to the intensity of glycemic control in individual patients should take these factors into consideration, as well as in setting an appropriate goal for the HbA 1C target.
Key concepts: Glycemic, Medicine, Glycated hemoglobin, Diabetes mellitus, Intensive care medicine, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Type 2 diabetes